J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1984. 58:1097-1106.
© 1984 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sorensen, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sorensen, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, B. W.

Estimation of Response to Selection Using Least-Squares and Mixed Model Methodology1,2,

D. A. Sorensen and B. W. Kennedy

University of Guelph3, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1

Abstract

Properties of least-squares and mixed model estimators of response to selection are discussed. The least-squares estimator is unbiased provided that the records have been properly adjusted for fixed effects (for example, using a control line), that selection is within generations and that there is only one record/candidate for selection. In the case of the mixed model estimator, it is unbiased and individual breeding values have minimum variance of prediction error provided that selection is within levels of fixed effects and the variances of the random effects before selection are known. If certain conditions are met, the mixed model approach does not require the use of a control line in order to partition adequately phenotypic trend into its genetic and environmental components. Henderson's results are extended to a model that includes several cycles of selection. It is shown that the relationship matrix accounts for the decline in variance due to genetic drift and it circumvents further reduction in variance due to gametic disequilibrium. Results are illustrated with Monte Carlo simultation.


Footnotes

1 Very useful discussions with R. Thompson, C. R. Henderson, R. L. Quaas and E. J. Poliak are gratefully acknowledged.

2 Financial support was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Holstein-Friesian Assoc. of Canada and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food.

3 Dept. of Anim. and Poul. Sci.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. E. Z. Mercadante, I. U. Packer, A. G. Razook, J. N. S. G. Cyrillo, and L. A. Figueiredo
Direct and correlated responses to selection for yearling weight onreproductive performance of Nelore cows
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(2): 376 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Blasco, D. Sorensen, and J. P. Bidanel
Bayesian Inference of Genetic Parameters and Selection Response for Litter Size Components in Pigs
Genetics, May 1, 1998; 149(1): 301 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Animal Science.