HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hutcheson, D. P. Articles by McLaren, J. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hutcheson, D. P. Articles by McLaren, J. B.

Effects of Pretransit Diets and Post-Transit Potassium Levels for Feeder Calves¹

Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Amarillo 79106 , US Department of Agriculture, Bushland, TX 79012 and and University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37901

Abstract

Two trials were conducted to study effects of K addition to receiving diets and the effects of feeding either a 55% concentrate diet or hay before shipment on the health, performance and blood chemistry of transported calves. One-hundred seven steer calves were used in trial 1 and 160 steer calves in trial 2. Postshipment diets for trial 1 contained .9 or 1.4% K and for trial 2 were .7, 1.3, 2.2 or 3.1% K. The preshipment diets were fed 3 d before shipment and the receiving diets were fed for 2 wk after feedlot arrival. Performance data were collected for 28 and 49 d for trials 1 and 2, respectively. Feeding a 55% concentrate diet before shipment significantly reduced mortality of transported calves. Potassium additions to the diet after arrival improved performance of transported calves. Upon arrival at the feedlot, calves fed the 55% concentrate diet preshipment had lower (P<.05) plasma urea-nitrogen (PUN) values than calves fed hay preshipment. Blood packed cell volume (PCV) increased (P<.05) as the receiving diet K level increased from .7 to 2.2%. The K recommended for transported calves was calculated to be 24.7 g/100 kg of body weight for the first 2 wk after arrival, 20% more than the requirement for nontransported calves.

¹ Technical Article No. 16936 of the Texas Agr. Exp. Sta., Texas A&M Univ.

² Professor, Texas Agr. Exp. Sta., Amarillo 79106.

³ Research Animal Scientist, USDA-ARS, Bushland TX 79012.

⁴ Professor,Dept. of Anim. Sci., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville 37901.

⁵ Mention of a trade name, propietary product or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable.