J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1983. 57:1412-1417.
© 1983 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bourdon, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinks, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bourdon, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinks, J. S.

Calving Date versus Calving Interval as a Reproductive Measure in Beef Cattle1

R. M. Bourdon and J. S. Brinks2

Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523

Abstract

Calving date and calving interval records obtained from the Beef Cattle Division of Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Des Moines, Iowa, were studied to determine the reproductive measure of choice when a fixed breeding season is employed. Fixed model, least-squares procedures were used to analyze 2,411 records collected on purebred Red Angus, Angus and Hereford cows during the years 1969 through 1976. Calving interval decreased .86 d and calving date was delayed .11 d for each 1-d delay in previous calving date. A 1-d increase in gestation length was associated with a 1.17-d delay in calving date and 1.17-d increase in calving interval. The bias caused by the use of a fixed breeding season was determined to be much greater for calving interval than for calving date, as evidenced by the strong dependence of calving interval on previous calving date. Because calving date is likely to be more heritable and has clear economic significance, and because selection for earlier calving date should not lead to adverse response in other reproductive traits, calving date was preferred over calving interval as a reproductive measure.


Footnotes

1 Approved for publication as Scientific Paper 2746 of the Colorado Exp. Sta.

2 The authors wish to acknowledge the cooperation of pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Des Moines, IA, in supplying the data for this study.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. I. Urioste, I. Misztal, and J. K. Bertrand
Fertility traits in spring-calving Aberdeen Angus cattle. 1. Model development and genetic parameters
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2007; 85(11): 2854 - 2860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Animal Science.