J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1983. 57:867-878.
© 1983 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bereskin, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bereskin, B.

Performance of selected and Control Lines of Duroc and Yorkshire Pigs and their Reciprocal Crossbred Progeny1

B. Bereskin2

US Department of Agriculture,3, Beltsville, MD 20705

Abstract

Performance records for 223 boars and gilts in Duroc and Yorkshire selected and control lines and for 231 boar and gilt progeny from reciprocal breed crosses were analyzed to evaluate (1) maternal effects, (2) effects of mass selection in purebreds on performance of crossbred progeny and (3) heterosis effects. Selection of purebred herd replacements was based mainly on an index (Index) of average daily gain (ADG), average scan backfat thickness (BF) and scan longissimus muscle (loin eye) area (LEA) among tested pigs. Mixed models were fitted separately to the purebred and crossbred populations, including effects of breeding group, sires within breeding group, sex, pertinent interactions and residual on Index and its component traits, ADG, BF and LEA. Crossbred pigs from Yorkshire dams had slightly larger (P<.10) LEA's and higher (P<.05) Indexes, suggesting a small maternal effect favoring Yorkshire dams over Duroc dams in crosses of these breeds. Crossbred pigs from Yorkshire dams also had a higher ADG and slightly less BF than crossbred pigs from Duroc dams, but the differences were not significant. Selection differentials were over three times as large for sires as for dams in purebreds and were substantially larger in selected lines than in controls where selection pressure was essentially zero for ADG and Index. In parental purebreds, selected lines exceeded controls for ADG, LEA and Index and had less BF. Selected lines crossbred progeny exceeded control lines crossbred progeny for all traits including BF. Responses in crossbreds to purebred selection varied with the trait, suggesting effects of genetic correlations, gene frequency differences, nonadditive genetic variance and sampling variation. Heterosis appeared not to be influenced by performance level or intensity or direction of selection in parental purebreds.


Footnotes

1 The author acknowledges with appreciation the valuable contributions of W. H. Peters, Meat Animal and Granary Manager, and R. L. Figulski, Animal Caretaker Leader, for managing the swine herd and recording performance data during the experiment.

2 USDA, Agricultural Res. Service, Beltsville Agricultural Res. Center, Anim. Sci. Institute, Nonruminant Anim. Nutr. Lab., Beltsville, MD 20705

3 Mention of a trade name does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Animal Science.