HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fronk, T. J. Articles by Gorewit, R. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fronk, T. J. Articles by Gorewit, R. C.

Comparison of Different Patterns of Exogenous Growth Hormone Administration on Milk Production in Holstein Cows¹

Cornell University⁵, Ithaca, NY 14853-0281

⁴ To whom reprints requests should be sent.

Abstract

Bovine growth hormone (bGH) was administered by three different methods to four Holstein cows in late lactation (13.4 kg/d). Treatments were 1) a placebo treatment, 2) single daily sc injection of bGH, 3) pulse iv injection of bGH at 4-h intervals and 4) continuous sc infusion of bGH. The three bGH treatment groups all received the same quantity of bGH (51.5 IU/d). Daily plasma profiles of bGH consisted of 1) a relatively constant concentration of 6 ng/ml for the placebo group, 2) a single peak (48 ng/ml) followed by a steady decline, for the single injection treatment, 3) six transient peaks (57 to72 ng/ml) 4 h apart for the pulse injection treatment and 4) a relatively constant elevation of bGH (26 ng/ml) for the continuous sc infusion treatment. Total amount of immunoreactive bGH measured in the plasma of the cows over 24 h was equal for the three bGH treatments. Increases in milk yield for the three bGH treatments did not differ and averaged 31%. Growth hormone treatment did not affect the percentage of milk fat or lactose, but resulted in a 10% decline in protein percentage. Dry matter intake declined an average of 9% and, coupled with increased milk yield resulted in a large increase in feed efficiency (47%). The similarity of the lactational responses to the three methods of administering bGH indicates that there is considerable flexibility in the method by which GH can be administered to dairy cows.

¹ Supported in part by Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., The Upjohn Co., American Cyanamid Co. and Monsanto Industrial Chemicals Co. The authors gratefully acknowledge R. Olsen (The Upjohn Co.) for donation of the bovine growth hormone and M. McEntee, L. Polan and M. Smithers for technical assistance.

² Present address: Carnation Milling Division, 327 East Mill Street, Circleville, OH 43113.

³ Present address: Victoria Dept. of Agr., Ellinbank, Dairy Research Institute, Warragul, Victoria 3820, Australia.

⁵ Dept. of Anim. Sci.