J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1983. 57:565-576.
© 1983 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Drewry, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Drewry, K. J.

Maternal Performance of Duroc, Hampshire and Landrace Backcross Gilts Fed Normal and High Fiber Diets during Postweaning Growth1,2,

T. S. Stewart and K. J. Drewry

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907

Abstract

Duroc (DDDY), Hampshire (HHHY) and Landrace (LLLY) backcross gilts produced from matings of purebred sires and sixth or seventh parity F1 Duroc-Yorkshire, Hampshire-Yorkshire or Landrace-Yorkshire sows were fed ad libitum either a high fiber (8.8% crude fiber, 2,910 kcal metabolizable energy (ME/kg) or normal fiber (3.9% crude fiber, 3,428 kcal ME/kg) diet during the postweaning growth period (70 to 170 d of age). A sample of 176 gilts was assigned randomly to one of three groups and exposed to purebred Yorkshire boars. All pregnant gilts were retained and exposed to boars for three additional production cycles. Sows failing to farrow were retained and returned to breeding with their contemporaries. Maternal performance, litter sizes at birth and weaning, pig weights, total litter weights and sow productivity index through four farrowings were not affected by postweaning dietary treatment of gilts. Interactions of nutritional regimen with either backcross type or exposure number were nonsignificant. Performances of the backcross types did differ. The DDDY had larger litter sizes at birth and weaning than HHHY or LLLY (12.0 vs 10.9 and 10.3 at birth and 9.6 vs 8.6 and 8.6 at weaning, respectively). Individual pig weights were similar at weaning among sow backcrosses. Therefore, DDDY females weaned heavier litters due to more pigs per litter and had higher sow productivity indices. Additionally, HHHY had a higher lactational weight loss and greater breeding and gestation weight gains than DDDY or LLLY. Sow feed consumption during lactation did not differ among backcrosses. Backcross type did interact statistically with sow group and exposure for several variables. Most significant interactions were due to differences in relative performance rather than absolute rank.


Footnotes

1 Journal Paper No. 9164, Purdue Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Dept. of Anim. Sci.

2 Data derived from the Purdue Univ. Contributing Project to NC-103 Regional Project, Genetic Improvement of Efficiency in the Production of Quality Pork.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Animal Science.