J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1983. 57:307-312.
© 1983 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langford, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Batra, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langford, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Batra, T. R.

Seasonal Effects of PMSG and Number of Inseminations on Fertility of Progestogen-Treated Sheep1 ,2,

G. A. Langford, G. J. Marcus and T. R. Batra

Animal Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6

Abstract

The influence of pregnant mares' serum gonadotropin (PMSG) on reproductive performance of sheep bred by artificial insemination (AI) was studied in the anestrous and estrous seasons. Ewes were treated with progestogen-impregnated intravaginal sponges in June and October. One-half of the ewes in each trial received PMSG at sponge removal and were inseminated 55 h after sponge removal. One-half of the ewes in each treatment group were reinseminated 5 h later. Conception rates in June and October were 82 and 87% with PMSG and 18 and 48% without PMSG, respectively. The corresponding lambing rates were 60 and 74% with PMSG and 10 and 26% without PMSG. Litter size was unaffected by season or PMSG use. Embryonic mortality estimated over both trials was 22% after the first 2 wk of pregnancy with PMSG, but was 44% when PMSG treatment was omitted. Two inseminations were not superior to one. These data indicate that irrespective of season or double insemination, PMSG improves reproductive performance of ewes bred by AI at progestogen-synchronized estrus.


Footnotes

1 Contribution No. 1045, Animal Research Centre.

2 Authors wish to thank Dr. A. J. Hackett for assistance in sponging and PMSG administration; Drs. L. Ainsworth and D. P. Heaney for assistance in artificial inseminations; D. Ostapyk and J. Arcand for care of animals; P. Panich for technical assistance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Animal Science.