J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1983. 56:1282-1286.
© 1983 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J. P.

Influence of Supplemental Light on Sow Performance during and after Lactation1,2,

J. S. Stevenson3, D. S. Pollmann3, D. L. Davis3 and J. P. Murphy4

Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506

Abstract

A completely randomized block experiment with two treatments was designed to investigate the effect of supplemental light on sow performance during and after lactation. Crossbred multi and primiparous sows were exposed to either limited (control, n = 164) or 16 h (n = 163) timer-controlled supplemental light beginning 3 to 9 d before expected farrowing. Overhead illumination (32 to 266 lux) was furnished by seven fixtures (two tubes each) of cool white fluorescent light at twice-daily feedings in control rooms (<1 h/d) and for 16 h/d in supplementally lighted rooms (16 h). Litter size was equalized within 48 h postpartum (10 ± .1 pigs/litter; X ± SE) in each of five identical rooms that served alternately as control or 16-h treatments during 10 consecutive weekly farrowings (September 24 to November 26, 1981). Litters were heavier (P±.05) at weaning (26 ± .1 d) for 16-h than for control sows (57.8 ± 1 vs 54.3 ± 1 kg) while pigs weaned (9.2 ± .1 vs 9.1 ± .1), piglet survival (90 vs 91%) and days to mating (5.9 ± .4 vs 5.5 ± .3) were similar (P>.05). However, more (P<.01) 16-h than control sows (83 vs 68%) were mated by 5 d postweaning. Multiparous sows weaned heavier (P<.05) litters than primiparous sows (57.9 ± 1 vs 50.1 ± 1 kg) while overall litter weight increased (P<.05) 141 ± 6 g for each 10 lux increase in light intensity. We concluded that litter weight is increased and return to postweaning estrus more synchronous when sows are exposed to 16 h supplemental light/d during a 4-wk lactataion.


Footnotes

1 Contribution No. 82-549-j, Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta., Manhattan 66506.

2 The authors wish to thank R. Rindt, P. Peters and D. Welborn of F & R Swine, Dwight, KS, and W. D. Schoenherr for their assistance and cooperation in conducting this study.

3 Dept. of Anim. Sci. and Ind.

4 Dept. of Agr. Engr.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. R. Niekamp, M. A. Sutherland, G. E. Dahl, and J. L. Salak-Johnson
Photoperiod influences the immune status of multiparous pregnant sows and their piglets
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2006; 84(8): 2072 - 2082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Animal Science.