J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1983. 56:1241-1252.
© 1983 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Byers, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Byers, F. M.

Influence of Body Composition on Energy Requirements of Beef Cows during Winter1

W. R. Thompson2, J. C. Meiske2, R. D. Goodrich2, J. R. Rust2 and F. M. Byers3

University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108 and and Texas A&M University, College Station 77840

Abstract

Twenty Angus-Hereford and 20 Angus-Holstein cows were individually fed 12.9 or 18.0 Meal metabolizable energy (ME)/head daily from November 28, 1979 through February 21, 1980. Energy retentions for the winter feeding period were calculated by determining body composition at the initiation and at the termination of the feeding period. After the experimental period, all cows were managed the same through weaning. Maintenance energy requirements (Kcal/d) estimated from linear regressions of energy retentions on ME intakes per unit body weight (BW)75 were 127.6 and 140.3 kcal/BW75 for Angus-Hereford and Angus-Holstein cows, respectively. Estimates of maintenance energy requirements for thin and fat cows within each breed type indicated that fatter cows of Angus-Hereford breeding had 6.1% lower energy requirements than thinner cows. Opposite trends occurred with Angus-Holstein cows, where fat cows had 2.7% higher maintenance requirements. Estimated maintenance energy requirements were higher (P<.01) for protein than fat tissue. Maintenance energy requirements of fat was -1.55 kcal ME/kg for Angus-Hereford cows, indicating that for cows of the same lean body mass, cows with more fat have a lower daily energy requirement during winter. Angus-Holstein cows had an estimated maintenance energy requirement of fat of 51.11 kcal ME/kg. Because cattle of Holstein breeding have less subcutaneous fat than cattle of the beef breeds, and less subcutaneous fat would provide less insulation, the estimated maintenance requirements of fat in Angus-Holstein cows may be an estimate of the true maintenance requirement of fat. Estimates of the partial efficiency of ME use for tissue gain and the ME sparing effect of body tissue loss were 78.8% and .70, respectively, for Angus-Hereford cows and 53.8% and .46, respectively, for Angus-Holstein cows. Regression of retained energy on cow BW75, body fat and body protein calculated for Angus-Hereford and Angus-Holstein cows from within energy level indicated that BW75 accounted for less variation in retained energy than weight of empty body fat or protein. Multiple regressions that contained all three variables accounted for 75% and 32% of the variation for Angus-Hereford and Angus-Holstein cows, respectively. Subsequent performance of the cow and calf was not affected by winter energy levels fed, body composition of cows before calving or energy changes of cows during the winter.


Footnotes

1 Paper No. 11998 of the Scientific Journal Ser. of the Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 Dept. of Anim. Sci., Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108.

3 Dept. of Anim. Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station 77840.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Berman
Tissue and External Insulation Estimates and Their Effects on Prediction of Energy Requirements and of Heat Stress
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1400 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Animal Science.