J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1983. 56:1186-1189.
© 1983 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chenault, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Chenault, J. R.

Fertilization Failure and Embryonic Mortality in Parous and Nonparous Beef Cattle1

R. R. Maurer2 and J. R. Chenault2,3,

US Department of Agriculture4, Clay Center, NE 68933

Abstract

One hundred and two nonparous females, 18 to 24 mo old, and 55 parous or multiparous beef females, 3 to 12 yr old, were mated naturally (d 0) and slaughtered on d 2 to 5, 6 to 8 or 14 to 16 of gestation. Each reproductive tract was flushed with phosphate-buffered saline, and the flushings were searched for an oocyte or embryo. Parous females had a higher (P<.05) fertilization rate than nonparous females. In nonparous females, reproductive failure was attributed equally to fertilization failure and embryonic mortality, which had occurred or was occurring by d 8 of gestation. In parous females, reproductive failure was attributed entirely to embryonic death. About 67% of this embryonic mortality had occurred or was occurring by d 8 of gestation; the other 33% occurred between d 8 and 16 of gestation. These findings show that in both nonparous and parous beef females, a large portion of the reproductive failure occurs by d 8 of gestation and would not have any noticeable influence on length of the estrous cycle.


Footnotes

1 The authors are grateful to Ken Weiser and Betty Petitjean for technical assistance; to Gary Peterson, Walt Green, Shelly O'Mear and John Siebrandt for the care and breeding of cattle, and to Cheryl Yates for stenographic work. Cooperation of the Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, is acknowledge.

2 Roman L. Hruska U. S. Meat Animal Reasearch Center, SE, ARS, P.O. Box 166.

3 Present address: The Upjohn Co., Reproduction and Physiology, 9670-190-1, Kalamazoo, MI 49001.

4 Mention of a trade name, proprietary product of specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. E. Echternkamp, R. A. Cushman, M. F. Allan, R. M. Thallman, and K. E. Gregory
Effects of ovulation rate and fetal number on fertility in twin-producing cattle
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3228 - 3238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Animal Science.