HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bennnett, G. L. Articles by Johnson, R. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bennnett, G. L. Articles by Johnson, R. K.

Simulation of Heterosis Effects on Costs of Pork Production¹

University of Nebraska and US Department of Agriculture, Lincoln, NE 68583-0908

Abstract

Individual plus maternal heterotic effects on swine production were simulated with a bioeconomic model by changing performance levels of eight traits: –8 d in age at puberty, +3% in conception rate, +.94 in pigs born/litter, +.035 kg in pig birth weight, +2.05 Mcal•sow^–1•d^–1 in maximum milk output, +8% in preweaning survival, +10.8% in protein growth rate and +17.3% in fat growth rate. Associated heterosis simulated for other traits, such as weaning weights and postweaning gain/feed, was similar to experimental results. Effects of heterosis on biological (feed Mcal/kg) and economic ($/kg) costs were evaluated by simulating two- and three-breed crosses and purebred production. Pig heterosis reduced $/kg lean or $/kg live weight by 4% for marketing at 100 kg, and by 6% for $/kg of lean and 8% for $/kg of live weight for marketing at average 185-d weight. Sow heterosis reduced $/kg lean or $/kg live weight about 4%. Pig heterosis reduced feed Mcal/kg by only 1% and Mcal/kg live weight by 3%, and both were reduced only 1% by maternal heterosis. Traits that reduced litter costs/kg of output by increasing output/litter were responsible for most effects of heterosis on $/kg. However, heterosis in growth rate was important for feed Mcal/kg of lean marketed at 100 kg, and for feed Mcal/kg of live weight marketed at either 100 kg or at 185-d weight. Nonfeed costs/kg lean or live weight marketed at 100 kg were reduced more than feed costs by pig heterosis (–5 or –6 vs –2 or –3%) and by sow heterosis (–8 vs –1 or –2%). Effects of pig heterosis on nonfeed costs were increased to –12 or –14% by marketing at mean 185-d weight. Percentage reductions in total costs from heterosis were about one-third as large as corresponding increases in output/litter at market age.

¹ Published as Paper No. 6756, Journal Ser., Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta., Lincoln.

² Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Anim. Sci., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln. Supported by Cooperative Agreement No. 3090-20372-013A or ARS, USDA, and Univ. of Nebraska. Present address: Ruakura Anim. Res. Sta., Ministry of Agr. and Fisheries, Hamilton, New Zealand.

³ Graduate Assistant, Dept. of Anim. Sci., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln. Present address: Dept. of Anim. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh 27650.

⁴ Research Geneticist, Roman L. Hruska US Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA, 225 Marvel Baker Hall, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908.

⁵ Professor, Dept. of Anim. Sci., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908.