J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1983. 56:755-760.
© 1983 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Byers, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by Byers, F. M.

Linear Measurements and Visual Appraisal as Estimators of Percentage Empty Body Fat of Beef Cows1

W. R. Thompson2, D. H. Theuninck2, J. C. Meiske2, R. D. Goodrich2, J. R. Rust2 and F. M. Byers3

University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108 and and Texas A&M University, College Station 77840

Abstract

Body compositions of 40 Angus, 20 Angus-Hereford and 20 Angus-Holstein spring-calving cows were determined by deuterium dilution at the initiation and at the end of the winter feeding period. For the winter feeding period, cows were allotted within breed to metaboliz-able energy (ME) levels of 12.9 or 18.0 Meal/ head daily. Weight (W), length, height, heart girth and condition score were measured on each cow before body composition determinations. Regressions were conducted within breed-body composition determination time groups to evaluate linear measurements and condition score as predictors of percentage empty body fat (PEBF) of beef cows. Regressions for Angus and Angus-Hereford cows were similar, but regressions for Angus-Holstein cows differed from those for Angus or Angus-Hereford cows. The best simple regression for the Angus-Holstein cows accounted for only 3% of the variation in PEBF. For the Angus and Angus-Hereford cows, condition score was the best estimator of PEBF (r = .66, P<.01). Weight: height ratio was correlated .58 (P<.01) with PEBF; however, weight alone was correlated .54 with PEBF. Regressions with W2.0, W.75 and W.5 did not improve R2 values over those obtained with W1.0. Log and square root transformations of linear measurements did not improve ability to estimate PEBF. Multiple regressions did not significantly improve R2 values over that of the simple regression of PEBF on condition score. Results of this study suggest that linear measurements are not superior to visual appraisal as estimators of body composition of beef cows.


Footnotes

1 Paper No. 11,999 of the Scientific Journal Ser. of the Minnesota Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 Dept. of Anim. Sci., Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108.

3 Dept. of Anim. Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station 77840.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Animal Science.