J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1982. 55:1264-1271.
© 1982 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brumm, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brumm, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, A.

Effect of Source of Pig, Housing System and Receiving Diet on Performance of Purchased Feeder Pigs1,2,3,

M. C. Brumm4, E. R. Peo, Jr.4, S. R. Lowry4 and A. Hogg5

University of Nebraska Northeast Station, Concord 68728

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of source of pig, housing system and receiving diet on performance of purchased feeder pigs. Pigs purchased from distant auction markets (DM) gained slower for the first 13 d post-arrival (P<.01, trials 1 and 2) than pigs of similar size purchased from local, one-owner sources (LS). In trial 1, LS feeder pigs gained faster (P<.01) from purchase to 93 kg than DM pigs. In trial 2, the DM pigs were more efficient in feed conversion than LS pigs (P<.01). The DM pigs required more medical treatments than LS pigs (P<.01). In trial 1, pigs housed in mechanically ventilated, partially slatted-pen facilities gained faster (P<.1) than those in nonmechanically ventilated facilities whereas in trial 2, the reverse was true (P<.05). Pigs housed in the nonmechanically ventilated facilities had a higher incidence of scours (P<.01, trials 1 and 2) than those housed in the mechanically ventilated facilities. Death loss was less (P<.01) for pigs in the nonmechanically ventilated facilities (trial 2). Pigs fed a 16% crude protein receiving diet for 13 d containing 20% oats had a poorer (P<.01) feed efficiency than those fed a corn-soy basal diet or a diet containing 20% oats plus 5% lard (trial 1). At the termination of both trials, there were no differences in rate of gain or feed to gain ratio between the three receiving diets. Feeding diets containing 20% oats had no effect on the incidence of post - arrival scours but death loss was less (P<.1) for pigs fed the receiving diet containing 20% oats (trial 1).


Footnotes

1 Journal paper no. 6653, Univ. of Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 The authors acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Tim Anderson with animal care and Mr. Dave Pankaskie with statistical analysis.

3 Funded in part by a grant from the National Pork Producers Council, Des Moines, IA.

4 Dept. of Anim. Sci.

5 Dept. of Vet. Sci.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Animal Science.