J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1982. 55:995-1001.
© 1982 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jesse, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jesse, G. W.

Withdrawal of Protein Supplement during a Portion of the Finishing Phase of Swine1

George W. Jesse2

University of Missouri,3, Columbia 65211

Abstract

Withdrawal of all of the protein supplement during a 9 kg increment of the finishing phase was studied during four trials with 321 crossbred barrows and gilts. Six dietary regimens that differed in level of crude protein during the weight period from 82 to 91 kg, 91 to 100 kg and 100 to 109 kg were compared. Average daily gain (ADG), feed efficiency and feed cost of gain for the entire growing-finishing period were similar for all six dietary regimens. However, as expected, performance during the early withdrawal period (82 to 91 kg) favored the control pigs significantly. Withdrawal of protein supplement had little effect on carcass traits. The results of this study indicate that all of the protein supplement can be removed from a corn-based finishing diet for a 9 kg increment without affecting performance substantially, if removal is after the pig reaches 91 kg. Although removal of the protein supplement during the 82 to 91 kg weight period caused the largest decrease in ADG, accumulative performance for the entire growing-finishing period did not differ as to the period of protein supplement withdrawal. However, removal of the protein supplement during the last 9 kg of gain would seem to be the most feasible from the standpoint of the producer.


Footnotes

1 Contribution from the Missouri Agr. Exp. Sta. Journal Series No. 8933. Approved by the Director.

2 The author wishes to thank Mr. Lyndle Vanskike for daily husbandry at the swine farm and Dr. Mark R. Ellersieck for his assistance with the statistical analysis.

3 Dept. of Anim. Sci.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Animal Science.