J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1982. 55:1125-1131.
© 1982 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rzepkowski, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rzepkowski, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, H. A.

Serum Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone and Prolactin Response to Photoperiod during the Estrous Cycle of Holstein Heifers1 ,2,

R. A. Rzepkowski, R. L. Ireland, R. L. Fogwell, L. T. Chapin and H. A. Tucker

Michigan State University3, East Lansing 48824

Abstract

The objectives were to determine if photoperiods of 8 h light: 16 h dark (8L:16D) and 16L:8D affect time of day when preovulatory surges of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) occur and if photoperiods affect diestrous and estrous concentrations of LH, FSH and prolactin (PRL). Postpubertal Holstein heifers were assigned to receive either 8L:16D (n=9) or 16L:8D (n=9) from September 21 through January 31. Hormone concentrations were determined in serum collected at 2-h intervals during diestrus and estrus of a single estrous cycle in autumn and again 4 mo later, during a single estrous cycle in winter. Neither photo-period nor season affected time of day at which preovulatory LH and FSH surges occurred in heifers. The LH surges did not differ in amplitude and duration within and between photoperiods and within individual animals. In 29 of 33 surges, peak concentrations of FSH coincided with peaks of LH. Peak concentrations of FSH were greater during the winter than during autumn in heifers exposed to 8L.16D, but were not different between autumn and winter in heifers exposed to 16L:8D. Between autumn and winter, surges of FSH were similar in magnitude and duration within individual animals. In comparison with 8L:16D, PRL was increased in heifers that received 16L:8D in autumn, but photoperiod had no effect on PRL during winter. Concentrations of PRL were increaseds at estrus relative to diestrus in autumn and winter. It is concluded that photoperiods of 8 and 16 h do not affect the timing, amplitude or pattern of preovulatory surges of LH of FSH, the rise in PRL associated with estrus, or lengh of estrous cycles in postpubertal Holstein heifers.


Footnotes

1 Michigan Agr. Exp. Sta. Journal Article No. 10131. This research was supported in part by USPHS grant HD 09883 and USDA Grant 901-15-2.

2 The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. K. W. Cheng, Dept. of Physiology, The Univ. of Manitoba, for his donation of bovine FSH hormone and antisera. The authors thank the National Institute of Health for NIH-LH-B8 (luteinizing hormone) and NIH-P-B4 (prolactin).

3 Dept. of Anim. Sci.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Animal Science.