J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1982. 55:909-923.
© 1982 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lomas, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Black, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lomas, L. W.
Right arrow Articles by Black, J. R.

Ammonia Treatment of Corn Silage. I. Feedlot Performance of Growing and Finishing Steers1

L. W. Lomas2, D. G. Fox3 and J. R. Black4,5,

Michigan State University6, East Lansing 48823

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to compare the feedlot performance of cattle fed corn silage treated with cold-flow anhydrous ammonia (ANAM) with the performance of cattle fed corn silage treated with other forms of nonprotein nitrogen (NPN) at the time of ensiling or untreated silage supplemented with soybean meal (SBM) at feeding time. Various sources and levels of supplemental N and systems of protein and mineral supplementation were evaluated to determine their effect on the feedlot performance of growing and finishing steers. A weighted average across the three trials revealed that cattle fed ANAM-treated silage had a 4.5% lower average daily gain (ADG) and an 8.8% higher dry matter intake/kg of gain than those fed untreated corn silage supplemented with SBM to a similar crude protein equivalent. In trial 1, addition of minerals in the form of ammonia mineral suspension (AMS) at time of ensiling resulted in a higher ADG (P = .004) and lower intake/kg of gain (P = .007) than did addition of minerals to ammonia-treated silage at feeding time. However, in trial 3, addition of minerals or calcium hydroxide to ANAM-treated corn silage at the time of ensiling resulted in no improvement in animal performance. Soybean meal supplementation of silage treated with 7.80 or 10.29 g of ANAM/kg of corn silage dry matter (CSDM) during the initial phase of the feeding period resulted in a higher ADG (P<.0005) and lower DM consumption/kg of gain (P = .052) in trial 2. However, in trial 3, SBM supplementation of silage treated with 7.80 g of ANAM/kg CSDM resulted in no improvement in overall performance (P>.20). In trials 2 and 3, supplementing untreated corn silage with SBM at a percentage of the diet that was decreased as the cattle became heavier resulted in ADG and feed efficiency similar (P>.20) to those obtained from the feeding of a constant level of SBM throughout the feeding period. In trial 3, cattle fed ANAM-treated corn silage had higher marbling scores (P = .030) and higher quality grades (P = .030) than those fed untreated silage supplemented with SBM. Carcass data were not collected in trials 1 and 2.


Footnotes

1 Michigan Agr. Exp. Sta. Journal Article No. 9172.

2 Present address: Southeast Kansas Branch Exp. Sta., Parsons.

3 Present address: Anim. Sci. Dept., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.

4 Dept. of Agr. Econ., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing.

5 Acknowledgment is expressed to USS Agri-Chemicals, Atlanta, GA and Calor Agr. Res., Okemos, MI for support of this research.

6 Dept. of Anim. Husb.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. W. Bruns, R. H. Pritchard, and D. L. Boggs
The effect of stage of growth and implant exposure on performance and carcass composition in steers
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 108 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Animal Science.