J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1982. 55:565-571.
© 1982 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kutsky, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Terrell, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kutsky, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Terrell, R. N.

Use of the Hennessy and Chong Fat Depth Indicator for Predicting Fatness of Beef Carcasses1

J. A. Kutsky, C. E. Murphey, G. C. Smith, J. W. Savell, D. M. Stiffler and R. N. Terrell

Texas Agricultural Experiment Station2, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843

Abstract

The unribbed left sides of 400 beef carcasses were probed with the Fat Depth Indicator (FDI), before and after chilling, at a point approximating the location at which the thickness of fat is measured in the determination of USDA yield grade. After ribbing, the actual fat thickness was measured with a ruler. The FDI readings from the warm and chilled sides explained about 45 and 66%, respectively, of the variation in the actual fat thickness measurement. Compared with actual fat thickness measurements, the FDI readings on the warm sides were more accurate (FDI mean values were closer to the actual mean values) than the FDI readings on the chilled sides, but the FDI readings on the chilled sides were more precise (more highly correlated with the actual measurements). Means for six, 5-mm-wide fat thickness groups based on FDI readings of either warm or chilled sides were ranked in the same order as the means for corresponding groupings based on actual fat measurements. In another group of beef carcasses (n = 50), FDI readings at seven locations on chilled sides were generally significantly correlated with the actual fat thickness measurements, with USDA yield grade and with carcass yields of cuts at two different carcass cutability endpoints. However, when added to the four factors used in the determination of USDA yield grade, none of the FDI readings made important increases in the explained percentage variation in cutability. The results of these studies indicate that while the FDI might be useful in segregating carcasses into fatness groups to achieve greater efficiency in chilling and fabrication, it likely would make little improvement in the accuracy of yield grading or in the selection of high or low cutability carcasses within the same yield grade.

Footnotes

1 Technical Article 17126 from the Texas Agr. Exp. Sta. This study was partially supported by Bettcher Industries, Vermilion, OH; Gooch Packing Co., Abilene, TX, and Friona Industries, Friona, TX.

2 Dept. of Anim. Sci., Meats and Muscle Biology Section.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Animal Science.