J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1982. 55:357-362.
© 1982 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moseley, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Staigmiller, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moseley, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Staigmiller, R. B.

Relationship of Growth and Puberty in Beef Heifers Fed Monensin1

W. M. Moseley2, T. G. Dunn3, C. C. Kaltenbach3, R. E. Short4 and R. B. Staigmiller4,5,

University of Wyoming, Laramie 82071, Livestock and Range Research Station, US Department of Agriculture and and Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, Miles City 59301, Cooperating

Abstract

An experiment was designed to determine the effects of dietary monensin on age and weight at puberty in Bos taurus crossbred beef heifers. One hundred and forty heifers were allotted to two weight classes: heavy (H) and light (L) groups, consisting of heifers above and below the average weaning weight, respectively. Heifers within each weight class were assigned to one of three diets during a 203-d winter feeding period: (1) R, 80% roughage: 20% concentrate; (2) Ml, R diet plus monensin (200 mg/head daily) with feed intake restricted to produce average daily gains (ADG) similar to R and (3) M2, R diet plus monensin (200 mg/head daily). ADG was higher (P<.001) for M2 heifers than for R and Ml heifers, which performed similarly. Age and weight at puberty were similar across treatments in L heifers. However, in the H group, HM1 and HM2 heifers were younger (P<.07) at puberty than HR heifers and this difference was not removed by covariate adjustment of either ADG or body weight. Weight at puberty was greater (P<.01) for HM2 heifers than for HM1 or HR heifers; however, this difference was removed by covariate adjustment of either ADG or body weight. Ninety-one percent of LM2 heifers and 100% of all other groups had reached puberty before the breeding season. Pregnancy rates did not differ significantly between treatment groups. Supplementation of a high roughage diet with monensin decreased age at puberty of heifers in the heavy weight class and this decrease was not due to increased body weight or ADG. Perhaps heifers with above average weaning weight possess a greater inherent growth potential than heifers below the average weaning weight and hence are more capable of utilizing monensin to an advantage.


Footnotes

1 This study was a contribution to Western Regional Research Project W-112, "Reproductive Performance in Beef Cattle." Publication has been approved by the Director of the Montana Agr. Exp. Sta., Journal Series No. 1184.

2 Present address: The Upjohn Co., Exp. Anim. Sci., Kalamazoo, MI 49001.

3 Division of Anim. Sci., Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie 82071.

4 Livestock and Range Res. Sta., USDA-ARS, Miles City, MT 59301.

5 The authors gratefully acknowledge Mr. J. McAskill and the Eli Lilly and Co. for their technical assistance and financial support.

6 Mention of trade names or companies does not constitute an implied warranty or endorsement by the authors or by the USDA.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Animal Science.