J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1982. 55:218-223.
© 1982 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rothschild, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hayenga, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rothschild, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hayenga, M. L.

Purchaser Response for Genetically Different Boars and Boar Semen1,2,

M. F. Rothschild3, L. L. Christian3 and M. L. Hayenga4

Iowa State University, Ames 50011

Abstract

Sales records on boars sold from a breeding company and semen sold from a boar artificial insemination stud were evaluated to assess the emphasis placed on performance data and costs by buyers of semen and boars, and to determine what affects boar semen price. Two data sets, that consisted of (1) numbers of boars sold in a given breed and genetic evaluation subclass and (2) units or dollars of semen sold for a boar over a specific sales period, were used. These sales were expressed as a percentage (market share) of the total sales over the 2-yr period. Equations to predict percentage market share (% MS) for boar sales included the fixed effects of period and breed and covariates for boar price and genetic evaluation within breed. All effects were important (P<.01), and R2 was .83. Percentage MS for units of semen sold was estimated using a model that included the fixed effects of period and breed and the covariates for cost per unit (CPU) of semen and backfat and gain within breed. Individual performance was more useful in predicting % MS and CPU than was any index. Subjective scores on mothering ability, size, soundness and libido were useful in predicting % MS units and CPU. For predicting % MS units, R2 values were as high as .44 for models with scores. Results indicated that buyers were willing to pay more per unit and purchase more volume of semen from boars that had test information.


Footnotes

1 Journal Paper No. J-10358 of the Iowa Agr. and Home Econ. Exp. Sta. Project 1901.

2 We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of both Kleen Leen Inc., Cedar Rapids, IA and International Boar Semen, Eldora, IA in providing data and International Boar Semen for their financial assistance in this project.

3 Dept. of Anim. Sci.

4 Dept. of Econ.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Animal Science.