J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1982. 54:1067-1071.
© 1982 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, W. R.

Least-Squares Analysis of Discrete Data1

Walter R. Harvey

The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210

Abstract

There are two important advantages of using general least-squares procedures to analyze discrete data. First is the ready availability of general least-squares computer programs. Second is the greater flexibility in the models which may be used when analyzed under least-squares procedures rather than by other methods. For example, one can easily complete covariance and even multiple covariance analyses under the least-squares procedures. Also, analyses may be completed under complex mixed models, and estimates of variance components for discrete characters, as well as covariance components between discrete and continuous traits, may be obtained. However, this summary would not be complete without a word of caution regarding tests of significance. Clearly, estimates of "treatment" effects and least-squares means obtained from an analysis of discrete data by least-squares procedures are unbiased. The accuracy of tests of significance depends largely on whether adequate numbers are available for the estimation of treatment or subclass means. In general, for binomial data, if nµ and n(lµ) are greater than or equal to 5 the tests of significance from a least-squares analysis will be accurate enough for practical purposes, where µ is the probability of "success" and n is the sample size.


Footnotes

1 Invitational paper presented at a Symp. on "Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data in Animal Research," Annu. Meet, of ASAS, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY, July 28,1980.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. E. Winkler Stirm and N. R. St-Pierre
Identification and Characterization of Location Decision Factors for Relocating Dairy Farms
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2003; 86(11): 3473 - 3487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Hansen, P. Madsen, J. Jensen, J. Pedersen, and L. G. Christensen
Genetic Parameters of Postnatal Mortality in Danish Holstein Calves
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2003; 86(5): 1807 - 1817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Animal Science.