J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1982. 54:800-805.
© 1982 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moser, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moser, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, A. J.

Effect of Grain Source and Dietary Level of Oat Hulls on Phosphorous and Calcium Utilization in the Growing Pig1,2,

R. L. Moser, E. R. Peo, Jr., B. D. Moser and A. J. Lewis

University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583

Abstract

Three metabolism trials were conducted to determine the effect of grain source and dietary level of oat hulls on dry matter digestibility, P and Ca retention and intestinal phytase activity of growing pigs. Twenty-four crossbred pigs (39 kg) were used. Dry matter digestibilities of corn-based diets were greater (P<.01) than grain sorghum-based diets (74.7 vs 63.5%). Diets containing 10% oat hulls had lower (P<.01) dry matter digestibilities than diets containing no oat hulls (64.0 vs 74.2%). The reduction in dry matter digestibility was similar with the addition of oat hulls to the diet, regardless of the source of grain. P and Ca retentions were not affected by dietary treatments. Fecal excretion of P was higher (P<.10) for pigs fed 10% oat hulls than for those fed no oat hulls. Fecal excretion of Ca and urinary excretion of Ca and P were not affected by dietary treatment. Intestinal phytase activity was evident in all pigs, but the dietary treatments had no apparent influence on phytase production in the small intestine.


Footnotes

1 Published as Paper No. 6080 Journal Ser. Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta.

2 Dept. of Anim. Sci. Acknowledgment is made to Mary Barnes and Cecillia Stodd for their laboratory assistance, and to Alice Teter and Diana Smith for preparation of this manuscript.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Animal Science.