HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Latimer, F. G. Articles by Stricklin, W. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Latimer, F. G. Articles by Stricklin, W. R.

Scrotal Measurements in Beef Bulls: Heritability Estimates, Breed and Test Station Effects¹

The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16801 and and University of Maryland, College Park 20742

Abstract

Heritability estimates for scrotal circumference and testicular tone at weaning (225 d) and yearling (365 d) were determined from records on 565 bulls from a purebred Angus herd; year, station and breed effects were determined from scrotal circumference records on 2,420 bulls at five test stations. Year, breed and breed x year effects on scrotal circumference, length, width and volume were determined from records on 347 bulls at one station. Heritability estimates (± SE) were .60 ± .17, .28 ± .18 and .25 ± .18 for weaning scrotal circumference, right and left tone, and .38 ± .16, .72 ± .18 and .52 ± .17 for yearling scrotal circumference, right and left tone, respectively. With the exception of low negative correlations of 205-d weight and longissimus muscle area with yearling scrotal circumference (–.01 and –.02, respectively), correlations of growth and live-estimated carcass traits with weaning or yearling scrotal dimensions were low and positive (.08 to .35). In the second data set, Simmental and Angus had greater (P<.01) yearling scrotal circumferences than Charolais or Herefords; means were 35.3, 35.0, 33.7 and 33.5 cm, respectively. Station and station x breed effects were significant (P<.01), with the latter effect indicating that breeds did not rank similarly in scrotal circumference at different test stations. In the third data set, scrotal circumference and volume were essentially the same as scrotal length and width in ranking breeds. Year x breed interactions were nonsignificant for all scrotal traits, indicating that breeds were ranked similarly in different years with respect to scrotal dimensions. These results indicate that bulls of different breeds should not be compared to established standards; a more acceptable procedure would be the use of deviations from the respective breed-station-year means.

¹ Approved by the Director, PAES, as Paper No. 6132 in the Journal Ser.

² Present address: College of Veterinary Medicine Ohio State Univ., Columbus.