J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1982. 54:363-376.
© 1982 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holecheck, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pieper, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Holecheck, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pieper, R. D.

Methods for Determining the Nutritive Quality of Range Ruminant Diets: a Review1

J. L. Holecheck2, M. Vavra3 and R. D. Pieper2

New Mexico State University, Las Cruces 88003 and Eastern Oregon Agr. Research Center, Union 97883

Abstract

Several methods are available for obtaining diet samples from range ruminants. Collection of samples from fistulated animals gives the most accurate representation of diets. Esophageal fistulated animals are generally superior to rumen fistulated animals because less labor is required and a diet sample more representative of forage actually consumed can be obtained. Salivary contamination of forage is a major problem when fistulated animals are used. This problem can be ameliorated by presenting data on an ash free basis. Fistula samples should not be used for P analysis because salivary contamination increases the P content. Salivary contamination may substantially lower forage sample digestibility although this needs further study. Methods for chemical analysis of the diet have been standardized with the exception of those for fiber. Presently, in vitro microdigestion is the preferred method for evaluating range ruminant diet digestibility. This procedure can produce results that are highly correlated to in vivo digestion and requires much less time. Rate of digestion provides an important measure of forage quality because intake of forages having rapid rates of digestion is greater than that for forages with slower rates of digestion but similar total digestibility. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy is a new technique showing great potential for evaluating diet digestibility and chemical characteristics. More information is needed on the relationship between nutritive characteristics of the feces and the forage consumed. Research shows that fecal analysis may have potential for evaluating the nutritive quality of range ruminant diets.


Footnotes

1 Journal Article 863, Agr. Exp. Sta., New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces 88003.

2 Assistant Professor and Professor of Range Science, Dept. of Anim. and Range Sci., New Mexico State Univ., Las Cruces 88003.

3 Associate Professor of Range Nutrition, Oregon State Univ., Eastern Oregon Agr. Res. Center, Union 97883.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Animal Science.