J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1981. 53:323-331.
© 1981 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jungst, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhlers, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jungst, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kuhlers, D. L.

Response to Selection for Feed Efficiency in Individually Fed Yorkshire Boars1

Steve B. Jungst2, Lauren L. Christian and Daryl L. Kuhlers2

Iowa State University, Ames 50011

Abstract

Five generations of selection for improved feed efficiency (feed/gain) were practiced from 1971 to 1976. Performance records were collected on 642 Yorkshire boars from 135 sires and 345 dams. All boars were individually fed ad libitum to 100 kilograms. Responses to selection were estimated by the regression of generation means adjusted for environmental effects on generation number. The regression of adjusted feed efficiency means on generation number was –.019 ± .025. The realized heritability of feed efficiency was .09 ± .08. Correlated responses to selection for rate of gain, daily feed consumption, backfat thickness and subjective feed wastage and pen cleanliness scores were estimated by the regression of generation means adjusted for environmental effects on generation number. The regression coefficients were .003 ± .018 for rate of gain, –.007 ± .029 for daily feed consumption, –.003 ± .022 for backfat thickness, –.021 ± .052 for feed wastage score and –.032 ± .037 for pen cleanliness score. None of the regression coefficients was significantly different from zero.


Footnotes

1 Journal Paper No. J-9683 of the Iowa Agr. and Home Econ. Exp. Sta. Arnes. Project No. 1901.

2 Present address: Dept. of Anim. and Dairy Sci., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. Bergsma, E. Kanis, M. W. A. Verstegen, and E. F. Knol
Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1067 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. A. Hoque, H. Kadowaki, T. Shibata, T. Oikawa, and K. Suzuki
Genetic parameters for measures of the efficiency of gain of boars and the genetic relationships with its component traits in Duroc pigs
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 1873 - 1879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. D. Snowder and L. D. Van Vleck
Estimates of genetic parameters and selection strategies to improve the economic efficiency of postweaning growth in lambs
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2003; 81(11): 2704 - 2713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Animal Science.