J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1980. 51:1306-1313.
© 1980 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butts, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Corrick, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Butts, W. T., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Corrick, J. A.

Relationship among Definable Characteristics of Feeder Calves, Subsequent Performance and Carcass Traits. II. Subjective Scores

W. T. Butts, Jr.1, E. R. Lidvall2, W. R. Backus2 and J. A. Corrick2

University of Tennessee and US Department of Agriculture, Knoxville 37901

Abstract

Three-hundred and forty-nine commercial calves of Angus, Hereford, Charolais-cross and Angus x Hereford breeding were fed to an estimated constant subcutaneous fat thickness (12 mm) on high and medium energy diets. Physical description of feeder calves, in terms of subjective scores for frame, fat and muscle, combined with initial calf weight and breed classification, explained 49% of the variation in carcass weight within diet-year subclasses and 32% of that in days on feed. Deletion of subjective scores from the models reduced coefficients of determination for carcass weight and days on feed by 13 and 5%, respectively. Corresponding reductions from deletion uf terms for breed were 9 and 11%. Among descriptive variables (listed in order of magnitude of partial mean-squares), frame (P<.001), breed (P<.001), initial weight (P<.05), fat (P<.05) and frame x breed (P<.05) were sources of variation in carcass weight; while breed (P<.001), frame x diet (P<.01) and fat (P<.01) were related to days on feed. In general, frame was positively related and fat negatively related to carcass weight and days on feed. Effects of frame were similar to those of measured wither height and body depth, and subjective fat was less related than ultrasonically measured fat to response variables. Coefficients of determination from models describing yield and quality grades were .11 and .07, respectively. Muscle was unrelated (P>.05) to response variables studied.


Footnotes

1 USDA, SEA, AR, Anim. Sci. Dept.,Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville 37901.

2 Anim. Sci. Dept., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville 37901.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. W. Bruns, R. H. Pritchard, and D. L. Boggs
The relationships among body weight, body composition, and intramuscular fat content in steers
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2004; 82(5): 1315 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Animal Science.