J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1980. 51:868-870.
© 1980 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, J. J.

Fraternity Size and Swine Reproduction. I. Effect on Fecundity of Gilts1

J. J. Rutledge2

University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

Abstract

Data from three generations of a selection experiment with Yorkshire swine were analyzed. Fraternity size was defined as the number of sibs at 2 weeks of age. In one line, potential replacements were reared in fraternity sizes initially set at six, while in the other two lines fraternity size was not altered. Over the period of study, gilts reared in small fraternities (mean = 5.77) averaged 11.30 pigs born, whereas gilts reared in an unaltered fraternity size (mean = 10.06) averaged 10.19 pigs born. Both of these lines had experienced two generations of selection for increased litter size. A randomly selected control line in which fraternity size (mean = 7.80) was not altered averaged 10.77 pigs born. Gilts reared in small fraternities were heavier at 21 days, but there were no significant body weight differences between lines at breeding or farrowing.


Footnotes

1 Paper no. 744 from Dept. of Meat and Anim. Sci. Research supported by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences. Contribution to the Regional Swine Breeding Project NC-103.

2 I am grateful to Drs. L. R. French, A. B. Chapman and M. Lorraine Leibfried for critical comments on a draft of this manuscript. The technical assistance of Mr. A. Gerbitz is gratefully acknowledged.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Animal Science.