J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1980. 51:672-678.
© 1980 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berger, T.
Right arrow Articles by Clegg, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berger, T.
Right arrow Articles by Clegg, E. D.

Sexual Maturation of Boars and Growth of Swine Exposed to Extended Photoperiod during Decreasing Natural Photoperiod1 , 2,

T. Berger, J. P. Mahone3, G. S. Svoboda, K. W. Metz and E. D. Clegg4

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907

Abstract

Littermate pairs of crossbred boars, barrows and gilts were used to study the effects of an artificially extended photoperiod during decreasing daylength on puberty in boars and on weight gain and feed efficiency. Libido scores of the boars exposed to the extended photoperiod were higher (P<.01) than those of controls at 24 and 26 weeks of age. At 26 weeks of age, semen had been collected from 74% of the boars on supplemental light but from only 26% of the controls. Lighting treatment did not affect semen quality. The number of ejaculates previously collected did affect semen quality. Motility and total sperm per ejaculate increased with increasing ejaculate number, while the percentage of abnormalities appeared to decrease. A second group of boars was delayed in the development of mating behavior, perhaps because of inadvertent consumption of Gibberella zeae-infected corn. The extended photoperiod did not exert a beneficial effect on weight gain or feed efficiency of boars, barrows or gilts.


Footnotes

1 Journal paper no. 7841, Purdue Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. A contribution from the Dept. of Anim. Sci.

2 Research supported by a grant from the National Pork Producers Council.

3 Present address: Dept. of Anim. Sci., MacDonald College of McGill Univ., Ste Anne de Bellevue, Quebec, Canada HOA ICO.

4 Present address: Div. of Vet. Biol., Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
H. Tucker and R. Ringer
Controlled photoperiodic environments for food animals
Science, June 25, 1982; 216(4553): 1381 - 1386.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Animal Science.