J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1980. 51:170-179.
© 1980 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chalupa, W.
Right arrow Articles by Brethour, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chalupa, W.
Right arrow Articles by Brethour, J. R.

Effects of Monensin and Amicloral on Rumen Fermentation1

William Chalupa2, William Corbett2 and J. R. Brethour3

University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square 19348,2 and , and Kansas State University, Hays 67601,3

Abstract

Fermentative adjustments produced by monensin and amicloral and by combinations of monensin plus amicloral were investigated in vitro. Monensin increased (P<.05) production of propionate, usually decreased production of acetate and butyrate and partially reduced methanogenesis, but no accumulation of gaseous hydrogen was observed. Amicloral not only increased production of propionate (P<.05), but also usually increased butyrate production, decreased (P<.05) acetate production and almost completely inhibited (P<.05) methanogenesis, and substantial quantities (P<.05) of hydrogen accumulated in the gas phase. Both chemical agents were effective (P<.05) in decreasing utilization of an exogenous amino acid load. Monensin plus amicloral produced fermentative adjustments comparable to those predicted from cultures medicated with monensin or amicloral alone; thus, effects mediated by the combined agents were additive and no consistent positive or negative synergestic activities were noted. Characteristic adjustments in rumen fermentation caused by monensin, by amicloral and by additivity of these adjustments are reflections of the two chemical agents manipulating ruminal reactions by different mechanisms.


Footnotes

1 Partial financial assistance was provided by the Animal Health Products Division, Smith Kline Corp., Westchester, PA 19380.

2 Nutr. Sec, Dept. of Clin. Studies, School of Vet. Med. Univ. of Pennsylvania.

3 Fort Hays Branch Exp. Sta., Kansas State Univ.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Calsamiglia, M. Busquet, P. W. Cardozo, L. Castillejos, and A. Ferret
Invited Review: Essential Oils as Modifiers of Rumen Microbial Fermentation
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(6): 2580 - 2595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
P. W. Cardozo, S. Calsamiglia, A. Ferret, and C. Kamel
Effects of alfalfa extract, anise, capsicum, and a mixture of cinnamaldehyde and eugenol on ruminal fermentation and protein degradation in beef heifers fed a high-concentrate diet
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2006; 84(10): 2801 - 2808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Busquet, S. Calsamiglia, A. Ferret, and C. Kamel
Plant Extracts Affect In Vitro Rumen Microbial Fermentation
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 761 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Animal Science.