|
|
||||||||
University of Florida, Gainesville 32611
Abstract
The basic objectives and procedures for successful crossbreeding of beef cattle were considered, with special reference to the levels of realized hybrid vigor that might be anticipated for different crossbreeding programs involving the American Brahman (Z1) and European (Ej) breeds. Intralocus heterozygosis levels with respect to breed origin of genes (breed heterozygosis) were computed for various crossbreeding systems. These values were weighted by approximate relative F1 heterosis levels for different breed combinations (1.0 for Z1Ej and .3 for E1E2) to yield the estimated relative hybrid vigor levels for total performance in alternative crossbreeding systems. The estimated average maternal heterosis levels for the various systems, were respectively 0, 33, 67, 66, 50, 54 and 49% for production of F1 (EZ) calves, three-breed terminal cross calves, two-breed-of-sire (E1Z1) rotation crosses, three-breed-of-sire (Z1 E1 E2) rotation crosses, two-breed (Z x E) synthetics, three-breed (Z1 x E1E2) synthetics and four-breed (Z1 E1 x E2E3) synthetics. The respective values for calf heterosis levels were 50, 57, 67, 66, 50, 54 and 49%. Successful crossbreeding requires (1) the choice of appropriate breed combinations for the environment and production system management programs to support the increased production potential or crossbred cattle.
1 Presented at a symposium on "The Role of Zebu Cattle in Efficient Beef Production" at the Annu. Meet, of the Southern Sec. of the ASAS, February 5, 1979, in New Orleans, LA.
2 Florida Agr. Exp. Sta. Journal Ser. no. 1700. Contribution from the Southern Beef Cattle Breeding Project (S-10).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. E. Wyatt, T. D. Bidner, P. E. Humes, D. E. Franke, and D. C. Blouin Cow-calf and feedlot performances of Brahman-derivative breeds J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3037 - 3045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Arango, L. V. Cundiff, and L. D. Van Vleck Breed comparisons of Angus, Brahman, Hereford, Pinzgauer, Sahiwal, and Tarentaise for weight, weight adjusted for condition score, height, and body condition score J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3142 - 3149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |