J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1980. 50:1108-1112.
© 1980 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Travis, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Pilbeam, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Travis, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Pilbeam, T. E.

Use of Artificial Light and Day Length to Alter the Life Cycles of Mink1

Hugh F. Travis2 and Thomas E. Pilbeam2,3,

US Department of Agriculture4 and and Cornell University, Itbaca, NY 14853

Abstract

Mink (Mustela vison) that had been raised on a farm were abruptly changed from ambient light at 42° N latitude to an artificial light regimen corresponding to 45° S latitude. The study was continued for 3 years and included three generations of mink. Animals were raised in a light-controlled room with partial temperature control that kept the temperatures between –3 and 26 C. Light schedules were changed weekly to correspond with changing day length. After an initial transition period of 9 months, the mink adapted so that their furring and reproductive cycles were in phase with the altered light regimen. Normal reproductive performance was observed in some males and females. However, the low percentage of both males and females that performed adequately makes the procedure economically unfeasible at this stage of our knowledge and experience. Possible causes of poor reproductive performance were: imprinting of previous light schedules on the animals, relatively high temperatures during breeding and improper light frequencies from artificial illumination.


Footnotes

1 The authors are grateful to the Mink Farmers Research Foundation for continuing support of these investigations. We also acknowledge the animal care provided by Mr. William Gardner, Sr. and Mr. Russell Cole.

2 US Sheep and Fur Animal Exp. Sta., AR, SEA, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853.

3 Present address: Dept. of Agr. Eng.

4 Mention of a trademark, proprietary product or vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the produce by the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products or vendors that may also be suitable.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Animal Science.