J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1980. 50:1085-1091.
© 1980 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Drummond, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, H. W.

Effects of Aerial Ammonia on Growth and Health of Young Pigs1

John G. Drummond2,3,, Stanley E. Curtis4, Joseph Simon5 and Horace W. Norton4

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana 61801

Abstract

The effects of graded concentrations of aerial ammonia on the performance of young pigs were studied. In each of three trials, four 4-week-old pigs from each of two litters were assigned to one of four air pollution exposure chambers. After 1 week, each chamber was randomly assigned to one of four atmospheres: filtered room air plus 0 (control), 50, 100 or 150 ppm of aerial ammonia. Pigs averaged 8.4 ± .26 kg body weight at the start of the treatment period. They were continuously exposed to these air regimens for 4 weeks. Individual body weights and feed disappearance within chambers were measured weekly. Following the exposure period, pigs were killed and examined grossly and histopathologically. Regression models were fitted to growth and gain to feed (G:F) data. The growth model indicated that aerial ammonia decreased pig growth. Percentage reductions from controls in average daily gain were 12, 30 and 29% for 50-, 100- and 150-ppm exposed groups, respectively. G:F values derived from the regression model were .53, .58, .58 and .53 for the respective groups. Pigs exposed to 50 or 100 ppm aerial ammonia appeared to be more efficient converters of feed to body weight gain than were controls or 150-ppm exposed pigs. An acute inflammatory reaction was observed in the tracheal epithelium of pigs exposed to aerial ammonia at 100 or 150 ppm, but not in controls or thosesubjected to 50 ppm. A mild-to-heavy acute exudate in the turbinate lumen was observed in some pigs exposed to 100 or 150 ppm ammonia.


Footnotes

1 Address reprint requests to Dr. Curtis at 124 Anim. Sci. Lab., Urbana, II 61801.

2 Present address: Life Sci. Div., IIT Research Institute, 10 West 35th Street, Chicago, IL 60616.

3 Part of a thesis submitted to the Graduate College of the Univ. of Illinois in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph. D. degree.

4 Dept. of Anim. Sci.

5 Dept. of Vet. Pathol, and Hygiene.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Sevi, L. Taibi, M. Albenzio, M. Caroprese, R. Marino, and A. Muscio
Ventilation Effects on Air Quality and on the Yield and Quality of Ewe Milk in Winter
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2003; 86(12): 3881 - 3890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
S. M. McGinn, H. H. Janzen, and T. Coates
Atmospheric Ammonia, Volatile Fatty Acids, and Other Odorants near Beef Feedlots
J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2003; 32(4): 1173 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Animal Science.