J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1980. 50:737-744.
© 1980 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehrez, A. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Opstvedt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mehrez, A. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Opstvedt, J.

Processing Factors Affecting Degradability of Fish Meal in the Rumen

A. Z. Mehrez1, E. R. Ørskov and J. Opstvedt2

Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of processing methods of fish meal on the rate and extent of degradation of fish meal in the rumen. The method used to estimate degradation was based on rate of degradation of fish meals incubated in polyester bags in the rumen of sheep with adjustment for outflow rate. The largest single factor influencing degradability was the length of time the fish were stored prior to processing, which increased degradability by 14 percentage units. Addition of formaldehyde reduced degradation in samples that were processed before any storage, but it had no effect on degradation in samples that had been stored and were stale before processing. Steam drying was shown to give slightly lower degradability than hot air drying, and the pepsin digestibility of the undegraded residues was slightly higher with steam than with hot air drying. Antioxidants had no effect on the rate and extent of degradation in the fish meal samples tested. The results demonstrated that the value of fish meal as a source of undegradable protein for ruminants for digestion in the small intestine could vary by more than 50% depending on processing method.


Footnotes

1 Present address: Faculty of Agr., Univ. of Mansoura, El-Mansoura, Egypt.

2 Present address: Sildolje og Sildemelindustriens, Forskinings institut, Bergen, Norway.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Animal Science.