J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1980. 50:680-688.
© 1980 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eisen, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eisen, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J. F.

Effect of Litter Size at Birth on Lactation in Mice1

E. J. Eisen2, J. Nagai3, H. Bakker4 and J. F. Hayes5

North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27650 and and Animal Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

The relative influence of litter size at birth and dam body weight at parturition on lactational performance was determined with five among-line crossfostering experiments involving 17 populations of mice. Included were lines selected for postweaning growth and maternal performance, and unselected controls. Twelve-day litter weight of a crossfostered litter standardized to six or eight pups was used as the criterion of lactational performance. Litter size at birth had a small positive correlation with 12-day litter weight when pooled within lines in each crossfostering experiment (.06 to .30, with mean of .17). The correlation between dam body weight at parturition and her crossfostered 12-day litter weight was consistently higher (.13 to .51, with mean of .35). Litter size was positively correlated with dam body weight at parturition (.33 to .56, with mean of .47). The partial correlation between litter size and 12-day litter weight, with dam body weight at parturition held constant, was reduced (–.07 to .18, with mean of .02) compared to the simple correlation. Multiple regression analyses indicated that dam body weight at parturition consistently accounted for more of the variation in 12-day litter weight than litter size. The data provide no evidence to support the hypothesis that increased fetal number or mass results in a greater lactational output by the dam.


Footnotes

1 Paper No. 6017 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agr. Res. Service, Raleigh, Contribution No. 843 of the Anim. Res. Institute, Ottawa and No. 65-490-14 of the Agricultural Univ. at Wageningen. The use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Agr. Res. Service of the products named, nor criticism of similar ones not mentioned.

2 Anim. Sci. Dept., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.

3 Anim. Res. Inst., Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

4 Dept. of Anim. Husb., Wageningen, the Netherlands.

5 Anim. Gen. Inst., Edinburgh Scotland.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. G. Riley, M. Zubair, P. C. Thomson, M. Holt, S. P. Xavier, P. C. Wynn, and P. A. Sheehy
Lactational performance of Quackenbush Swiss line 5 mice
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2006; 84(8): 2118 - 2125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Animal Science.