HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Forero, O. Articles by Lusby, K. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Forero, O. Articles by Lusby, K. S.

Evaluation of Slow-Release Urea for Winter Supplementation of Lactating Range Cows^{1 ,2 ,3,}

Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater 74074

Abstract

A new slow-release urea compound (SRU), previously shown to release ammonia slowly in the rumen was evaluated under range conditions. Eighty-five lactating Hereford cows, grazing dormant native range forage, were individually fed five different supplements in a 92-day trial. Supplements contained: 15 or 40% natural protein (negative and positive control, respectively), 1.22 kg/head/day; 40% protein (62.5% of crude protein equivalent from SRU), 1.22 kg/head/day; 40% protein (62.5% of crude protein from urea), 1.22 kg/head/day; and 20% protein (62.5% of crude protein equivalent from urea), 2.44 kg/head/day. Cow daily weight changes were –.98, –.39, –.74, –.85 and –.85 kg, respectively. The positive control was different (P<.05) from all other treatments. Cows fed SRU tended to lose less weight than urea-fed cows, while both SRU-and urea-fed cows lost less (P<.05) weight than negative control cows. Calf daily gains were: .39, .50, .44, .37 and .36 kg, respectively. Calves of positive control cows gained faster (P<.05) than from all other treatments. Calves of SRU cows gained faster (P<.05) than calves of urea or negative control cows. Cow rebreeding performance was poorest for the negative control and highest for the positive control, with SRU and urea treatment being intermediate. No supplement refusals were observed in cows fed natural protein or SRU supplements, whereas cows fed urea supplements consumed only about 60% of the amount offered. Rumen fluid samples taken by stomach tube at 1 and 4 hr after supplement feeding showed that SRU produced rumen ammonia patterns similar to those seen with soybean meal. Forage intake, estimated by use of markers, was 7.0, 9.3, 8.4, 8.5 and 8.0 kg/day for the negative and positive controls, 40% SRU, 40% urea and 20% urea supplements, respectively. Although SRU improved cow and calf performance over that seen with urea, performance of SRU-fed cows was still unacceptable. It is probable that some of the improved performance with SRU resulted from improved supplement (and energy) intake.

¹ Journal Article 3652 of the Oklahoma Agri. Sta., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater 74074.

² The authors express their appreciation to Dr. Robert Morrison for his help in statistical analayis.

³ This research was partially funded by NIPAK Corp., Pryor, OK.

⁴ Present address: Carrera 43 A No. 105-86, Bogota, Columbia, South America.

⁵ Anim. Sci. Dept.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. G. Farmer, B. C. Woods, R. C. Cochran, J. S. Heldt, C. P. Mathis, K. C. Olson, E. C. Titgemeyer, and T. A. Wickersham Effect of supplementation frequency and supplemental urea level on dormant tallgrass-prairie hay intake and digestion by beef steers and prepartum performance of beef cows grazing dormant tallgrass-prairie J Anim Sci, March 1, 2004; 82(3): 884 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]