J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1979. 49:448-460.
© 1979 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koch, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Crouse, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koch, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Crouse, J. D.

Characterization of Biological Types of Cattle - Cycle II: III. Carcass Composition, Quality and Palatability1 ,2,

R. M. Koch3, M. E. Dikeman4, R. Jerry Lipsey4, D. M. Allen4 and J. D. Crouse5

University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506 and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, NE 68933

Abstract

Composition and quality characteristics of 775 steer carcasses obtained from matings of Hereford, Angus, Red Poll, Brown Swiss, Gelbvieh, Maine Anjou and Chianina sires to Hereford and Angus cows were compared after adjustment to equal 1) age, 2) weight, 3) fat thickness, 4) fat trim percentage and 5) marbling score end points. Breed groups differed significantly in growth rate of fat, lean and bone. The average liveweight at which breed groups reached 18.9% fat trim was 400 kg for straight-bred Angus, 416 kg for Red Poll crosses, 418 kg for Hereford-Angus crosses, 439 kg for straight-bred Herefords, 523 kg for Brown Swiss crosses, 536 kg for Gelbvieh crosses, 564 kg for Maine Anjou crosses and 661 kg for Chianina crosses. At equal fat trim percentage there were significant differences in marbling, but only small differences in percentage of retail product or bone were observed, which indicates only slight differences in muscle-to-bone ratio among breed groups. At a constant fat thickness breed group differences in composition were reduced more than 50% relative to differences at a constant age (although some breed group differences remained because of differential deposition of subcutaneous, intermuscular, intramuscular and kidney and pelvic fat). Differences in composition were greatest at a constant weight. Growth rate of breed groups and percentage of retail product and bone were positively associated. Taste-panel evaluation of a subset of 377 carcasses revealed that breed groups differed significantly in tenderness; all groups, however, were scored in the range of moderately tender. Sire breed groups did not differ significantly in juiciness or flavor. The results indicate that in animals of similar age and raised under the same feeding and management conditions, differences in palatability among breed groups were small.


Footnotes

1 Published as Paper No. 5676 Journal Series, Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station, Lincoln and Contribution No. 79–114J, Department of Animal Science and Industry, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Manhattan.

2 The authors are grateful for the assistance of the Standardization Branch, Food Safety and Quality Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, especially C. E. Murphey, in grading carcasses.

3 Animal Science Department, University of Nebraska, U. S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center.

4 Department of Animal Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan.

5 U. S. Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research-Science and Education Administration, Clay Center, NE.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Rios-Utrera, L. V. Cundiff, K. E. Gregory, R. M. Koch, M. E. Dikeman, M. Koohmaraie, and L. D. Van Vleck
Effects of age, weight, and fat slaughter end points on estimates of breed and retained heterosis effects for carcass traits
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 63 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. L. Wheeler, L. V. Cundiff, S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie
Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VII): Carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 196 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. T. Page, E. Casas, R. L. Quaas, R. M. Thallman, T. L. Wheeler, S. D. Shackelford, M. Koohmaraie, S. N. White, G. L. Bennett, J. W. Keele, et al.
Association of markers in the bovine CAPN1 gene with meat tenderness in large crossbred populations that sample influential industry sires
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2004; 82(12): 3474 - 3481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. L. Wheeler, L. V. Cundiff, S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie
Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VI): Carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2004; 82(4): 1177 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. A. Nephawe, L. V. Cundiff, M. E. Dikeman, J. D. Crouse, and L. D. Van Vleck
Genetic relationships between sex-specific traits in beef cattle: Mature weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height and body condition score of cows, and carcass traits of their steer relatives
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2004; 82(3): 647 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. J. Baas, R. N. Goodwin, L. L. Christian, R. K. Johnson, O. W. Robison, J. W. Mabry, K. Clark, M. Tokach, S. Henry, and P. J. Berger
Design and standards for genetic evaluation of swine seedstock populations
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2003; 81(10): 2409 - 2418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. K. Splan, L. V. Cundiff, M. E. Dikeman, and L. D. Van Vleck
Estimates of parameters between direct and maternal genetic effects for weaning weight and direct genetic effects for carcass traits in crossbred cattle
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3107 - 3111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society of Animal Science.