J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1979. 49:396-402.
© 1979 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Butts, W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Butts, W. T.

Genotype by Environment Interactions in Hereford Cattle: I. Reproductive Traits1

M. Koger2, W. C. Burns3, O. F. Pahnish4 and W. T. Butts5 ,6,

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Brooksville, FL, 33512, Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, Gainesville, 32601 and Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, Miles City 59301

Abstract

Genotype by environment interactions involving the reproductive performance of different lines of Hereford cattle in the contrasting environments of Brooksville, FL and Miles City, MT, were studied in a cooperative, interregional project from 1961 through 1974. During phase 1 of the study, performance of two unrelated lines (M1 and F6), previously developed at the two stations, were compared at each of the two locations. Simultaneously, a derivative of M1 cattle (F4) was selected for performance in Florida. Reproductive performance of these related lines (M1 and F4) were compared at each of the two locations during phase 2 of the study.

Line by location interaction effects were highly significant for pregnancy and weaning rates during both phases of the study. In phase 1, the advantage of the local over the introduced lines was 6.7 (P<.01) for pregnancy percentage and 6.1 (P<.01) for weaning percentage. Corresponding values for phase 2 were 11.6 (P<.01) and 12.5 (P<.01), respectively. These results suggest that genetic adapation to the local environment is important in beef cattle production and should be considered in designing commercial breeding programs.


Footnotes

1 This work was conducted as an interregional effort by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, SEA, AR, and the State Agricultural Stations of Florida and Montana. The cattle were located at the Brooksville Beef Cattle Research Station, Brooksville, FL, and the Range and Livestock Experiment Station, Miles City, MT under Regional Projects S-10 and WRCC-1, Published as Florida Agr. Exp. Sta. Journal Series No. 1211.

2 Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, Gainesville.

3 Brooksville Beef Cattle Research Station, SEA, AR, Brooksville, FL.

4 Livestock and Range Research Station, SEA, AR, Miles City, MT.

5 U.S. Department of Agriculture, SEA, AR, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville.

6 Appreciation is expressed to J. S. Brinks, N. M. Kieffer, R. S. Temple, E. J. Warwick and F. S. Wilson for contributions during initiation of the project and to B. W. Knapp and J. J. Urick for data collection and livestock management.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. D. MacNeil
Invited Review: Research contributions from seventy-five years of breeding Line 1 Hereford cattle at Miles City, Montana
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2009; 87(8): 2489 - 2501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society of Animal Science.