J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1979. 48:1159-1164.
© 1979 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahone, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Singleton, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahone, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Singleton, W. L.

Photoinduction of Puberty in Boars during Naturally Occurring Short Day Lengths1

J. P. Mahone2, T. Berger, E. D. Clegg and W. L. Singleton

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907

Abstract

Nine pairs of littermate boars were used to study effects of artificial lengthening of photoperiod on onset of puberty. The control group was exposed to natural daylight (9.3 to 12.7 hr) through windows in a growing and finishing house from October to April. Those in the lighted group received supplemental light in the morning and evening for a total photoperiod of 15 hours. There was no difference in body weight between boars in the two groups for the first 5 months of age. However, at 24 weeks of age, those in the lighted group were heavier (P<.05). Feed intake was reduced at 25 weeks of age, and the difference in body weight gradually disappeared thereafter. Testicular firmness decreased with age, and testes of the treated animals were less firm from 24 to 30 weeks of age. There was no difference in testicular volume between the two groups. At 8 months of age, semen had been collected from only 55.5% of the control boars, but had been collected from all boars exposed to supplemental light. Of the boars collected, there was no difference between treatments in sperm concentration, sperm-rich fraction volume, total ejaculate volume, percentage progessively motile sperm or percentage abnormal sperm either by collection interval or by ejaculate number. Overall sperm concentration and total viable sperm were greater (P<.01) for boars receiving supplemental lighting. No increase in numbers or types of abnormal sperm was observed with photoperiod stimulation.


Footnotes

1 Journal Paper No. 7297 of the Purdue Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Animal Sciences.

2 Present address: Department of Animal Science, Macdonald College of McGill University, Ste Anne de Bellevue, Quebec CA H0A 1CO.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
H. Tucker and R. Ringer
Controlled photoperiodic environments for food animals
Science, June 25, 1982; 216(4553): 1381 - 1386.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society of Animal Science.