J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1978. 47:1254-1259.
© 1978 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaines, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Butts, W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gaines, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Butts, W. T.

Heterosis from among British Breeds of Beef Cattle: Straightbred versus Crossbred Cows. II1

J. A. Gaines2, C. Hill3, R. C. Carter4, W. H. McClure2 and W. T. Butts5

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061 and and United States Department of Agriculture

Abstract

This is the second paper dealing with phase two of the Virginia experiment, namely, comparison of straightbred and crossbred cows when all the calves were crossbred. The first paper covered birth and weaning information, including fertility and livability. The present paper covers post-weaning information on 214 heifers and 234 steers.

The post-weaning data were found to show few differences that were biologically significant. Practically speaking, most of the differences between means of crossbred cow types and straight breds were small, indicating a decline in the influence of cow size and breeding after the calves were weaned. Some of the differences between backcross and three-breed cross calves (those for growth traits) were significant in favor of the three-breed crosses.

The conclusion reached by the authors was that little heterosis existed in the crossbred cows for the post-weaning traits measured, and it was more important to have the calves crossbred than it was to have the cows crossbred. However, the dams represented only one step in a rotational crossbreeding system, so final judgment of the cows will have to await the results of further research.

Footnotes

1 Published with approval of the Director of the Research Division, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Contribution of the Southern Regional Project S-10, Improvement of Beef Cattle through Breeding Methods.

2 Department of Animal Science, V. P. I. & S. U., Blacksburg, VA 24061.

3 From a dissertation by this author. Present address: Delaware Valley College of Science and Agriculture, Doyleston, PA 18901.

4 Deceased.

5 Investigations Leader S-10, 205 Animal Science Bldg., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37916.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Animal Science.