J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1978. 47:935-943.
© 1978 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartnell, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Satter, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hartnell, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Satter, L. D.

Effect of Masonex (Hemicellulose Extract) on Protein Degradation by Rumen Microorganisms in Vitro and in Vivo1

Gary F. Hartnell2 and Larry D. Satter

University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

Abstract

Soybean meal was treated with Masonex, a molasses like by-product of the hardboard industry, to determine if some Masonex constituents could react with protein and reduce protein degradation by rumen microbes. In Experiment 1, soybean meal treated with 10% Masonex or cane molasses, with or without extrusion, was incubated in continuous culture fermentors charged with rumen ingesta. The fermentors were fed twice daily for a period of 10 days with a ration consisting of alfalfa meal and treated soybean meal. Total protein output by the fermentors was measured as tungstic acid precipitable nitrogen (TAPN). Following adjustments for small differences in volatile fatty acid production and nitrogen recovery, about 15% more soy protein escaped degradation when treated with Masonex than when treated with cane molasses. This is an approximation based on some assumptions. Masonex from a California source appeared more effective than Masonex from a Mississippi source.

In Experiment 2, 48 weanling lambs were divided into two groups with each group fed a ration containing soybean meal which had been extruded with either 10% Masonex or cane molasses at 105 C. There were no differences (P<.05) between the groups regarding growth, feed efficiency, wool growth, and ruminal volatile fatty acids or ammonia concentration.

In Experiment 3, six lambs were used in a single reversal design to determine ration digestibility when soybean meal extruded at 104 C with either 10% Masonex or cane molasses was fed. There were no differences (P<.05) in dry matter intake, dry matter and crude protein digestibility, or nitrogen balance.

It was concluded that Masonex can react with feed protein and afford some protection against degradation by rumen microbes. Differences exist between source and batch of Masonex, suggesting that the active compounds are either variable in amount or unstable with storage.


Footnotes

1 Research supported by the-Masonite Corporation, Chicago, Ill., by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and by Federal Hatch Project 1891.

2 Present address: Allied Mills, Inc., Research and Development Center, P.O. Box 459, Libertyville, IL 60048.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Animal Science.