HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rohweder, D. A. Articles by Jorgensen, N. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rohweder, D. A. Articles by Jorgensen, N.

Proposed Hay Grading Standards Based on Laboratory Analyses for Evaluating Quality¹

Abstract

This paper constitutes a report from the Forage Analysis Subcommittee of the Hay Marketing Task Force organized by the American Forage and Grassland Council and presents a proposal for the establishment of market hay grades. The need for hay standards that will more adequately express feed value in forages and that will communicate this value among agricultural scientists, agri-business clientele, and producers has long been recognized world wide. The Forage Analysis Subcommittee surveyed United States scientists working with forage quality and animal nutrition to obtain a concensus of opinion relative to more precise techniques for evaluating forage quality. Subsequently, research data were collected on forage samples from widely differing climates in the United States. Samples included the following species: alfalfa — Medicago sativa L.; smooth bromegrass — Bromis inermis Leyss.; orchardgrass — Dactylis glomerata L.; reed canarygrass — Phalaris arundinacea L.; tall fescue — Festucaarundinacea Schreb.; ‘Pangola’ digitgrass — Digitaria decumbens Stent.; bahiagrass — Paspalumnotatum Flügge; and ‘Suwannee’ bermudagrass Cynodon Dactylon (L.) Pers. The relationships of acid detergent fiber with in vivo digestible dry matter and neutral detergent fiber with dry matter intake are reported. A relative feed value based upon digestible dry matter intake as an estimate of digestible energy intake is proposed for evaluation of all forages. Five hay grades and one sample grade³ for all legumes and grasses are proposed by the committee.

¹ Invitational paper presented as part of the Symposium on Pastures and Forages, held during the Annual Meeting of the ASAS at Madison, WI, July 23 to 27, 1977.

² Professor of Agronomy, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences and University of Wisconsin-Extension, Madison; Staff Scientist, National Program Staff, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland; and Professor of Dairy Science, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, respectively.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. J. Hackmann, J. D. Sampson, and J. N. Spain Comparing relative feed value with degradation parameters of grass and legume forages J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2344 - 2356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Posner, J. O. Baldock, and J. L. Hedtcke Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trials: I. Productivity 1990-2002 Agron. J., February 26, 2008; 100(2): 253 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Strydhorst, J. R. King, K. J. Lopetinsky, and K. N. Harker Forage Potential of Intercropping Barley with Faba Bean, Lupin, or Field Pea Agron. J., January 11, 2008; 100(1): 182 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Mourino, K. A. Albrecht, D. M. Schaefer, and P. Berzaghi Steer Performance on Kura Clover-Grass and Red Clover-Grass Mixed Pastures Agron. J., May 1, 2003; 95(3): 652 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Cusicanqui and J. G. Lauer Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Corn Forage Yield and Quality Agron. J., November 1, 1999; 91(6): 911 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text]