J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1978. 47:448-455.
© 1978 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newman, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by El-Negoumy, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Newman, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by El-Negoumy, A. M.

Comparative Nutritive Value of Glacier and High Amylose Glacier Barleys1 ,2 ,3,

C. W. Newman, R. F. Eslick, C. C. Calvert4 and A. M. El-Negoumy

Montana State University, Bozeman 59717

Abstract

Five pairs of High Amylose Glacier and Glacier barleys were compared chemically and with weanling rats in growth and nitrogen balance trials. High Amylose Glacier contained more (P<.01) amylose and less (P<.01) amylopectin than Glacier. Osborne fractionation of the protein from the two cultivars revealed major protein differences resulting in different amino acid compositions. High Amylose Glacier contained more (P<.05) of the salt soluble proteins, more (P<.01) lysine and produced superior (P<.01) growth and protein efficiency ratios in weanling rats. The biological value (BV) of High Amylose Glacier was greater (P<.01) than that of Glacier although true protein digestibility (TPD) was highest (P<.01) in the latter barley. The reversal in values obtained in BV and TPD for these cultivars may be explained by their respective differences in protein composition.


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, Journal Series No. 817.

2 The authors wish to thank the following individuals for their assistance: Don Baldridge, Shirley Gerhardt, Frankie Larson, Dana Leininger, Nancy Roth, Ervin Smith, Jane Stobart and Steven Ullrich.

3 This study was supported in part by U.S. AID Contract ta-C-1094.

4 Present address, Animal Science Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Animal Science.