J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1978. 47:427-434.
© 1978 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seerley, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by McCampbell, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Seerley, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by McCampbell, H. C.

Environmental Influence on Utilization of Energy in Swine Diets

R. W. Seerley, M. C. McDaniel and H. C. McCampbell

University of Georgia1, Athens 30602

Abstract

Two-hundred-fifty-six Yorkshire weanling pigs were used in four trials conducted to compare the effects of summer and winter seasons (warm and cool), dietary energy (1.5 and 9.0% added animal fat) and protein sources on performance and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing swine.

Average daily gains were not affected significantly by dietary energy level with combined data from warm and cool-season trials. Nine percent fat supplementation to the ration resulted in a 3% improved feed efficiency (P<.05), slightly increased dressing percent and backfat and decreased loin-eye area and percent primal cuts (P<05).

Seasons had no significant effect on growth rate, feed efficiency or dressing percent with combined dietary treatment data. Pigs fed during winter had carcasses with a significantly (P<.05) higher percent of ham, loin and lean cuts. There were important season-energy interactions. Daily gains were identical (.75 kg) for dietary fat levels during cool-season trials; while during summer trials pigs fed high fat diets gained .05 kg faster than pigs fed low fat diets. This difference resulted in a significant interaction at the 10% level between fat level (9.0%) and season for rate of gain. Feed efficiency was improved by 13.0% as the level of energy was increased during the summer (P<.05). Utilization of calories for growth was estimated to be equal for low and high energy diets during cool season trials, whereas high energy diets were most efficient in warm season trials. In summer, pigs fed 9% fat yielded carcasses with higher dressing percent, more backfat (P<.01), and less loin-eye area and lean cuts (P<.05).

Protein source did not significantly affect growth rate, feed efficiency, dressing percent or backfat thickness. Means of other carcass traits differed (P<.05) among some dietary treatments. Barrows gained faster and had more (P<.01) backfat than gilts, but gilt carcasses were longer (P<.01), with a larger (P<.01) loin-eye area and a higher (P<.05) yield of lean cuts than barrows.


Footnotes

1 Department of Animal and Dairy Science.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. K. Apple, C. V. Maxwell, D. C. Brown, K. G. Friesen, R. E. Musser, Z. B. Johnson, and T. A. Armstrong
Effects of dietary lysine and energy density on performance and carcass characteristics of finishing pigs fed ractopamine
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2004; 82(11): 3277 - 3287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. J. Webster, R. D. Goodband, M. D. Tokach, J. L. Nelssen, S. S. Dritz, J. C. Woodworth, M. De La Llata, and N. W. Said
Evaluating processing temperature and feeding value of extruded-expelled soybean meal on nursery and finishing pig growth performance
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2003; 81(8): 2032 - 2040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Animal Science.