J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1978. 47:19-28.
© 1978 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deutscher, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Slyter, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Deutscher, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Slyter, A. L.

Crossbreeding and Management Systems for Beef Production1, 2,

G. H. Deutscher3 and A. L. Slyter3

South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007

Abstract

A 6-year study (1969 to 1974) was conducted in western South Dakota to compare calf production of 90 Angus-Hereford crossbred cows under a drylot vs a pasture management system. In phase I (first 3 years), a backcrossing program utilizing Angus and Hereford sires was studied. In phase II (last 3 years), a three-breed terminal cross program utilizing Charolais sires was added to the breeding program. Preweaning, feedlot and carcass traits of calves from the three sire breeds were compared. Drylot cows were confined in a drylot year-round while pasture cows were maintained primarily on native pasture. One-half of drylot calves within sire groups received creep feed while remaining drylot calves and all pasture calves received no creep feed.

No significant differences were found between management systems for conception rate or percent calf crop weaned of cows exposed. Least-squares analysis (N = 387) showed no significant differences between management systems for calf birth weight, birth date or calving difficulty score. Actual and adjusted calf weaning weights of the drylot no-creep calves were less (P<.01) than the drylot creep and pasture calves, which were similar. Most feedlot and carcass traits were affected (P<.05) by the preweaning management system.

Breed of sire affected (P<.05) many preweaning, feedlot and carcass traits. Charolais sired three-breed cross calves were heavier at birth and at weaning, gained faster in the feedlot and had heavier final feedlot and carcass weights than either the Angus or Hereford sired backcross calves. Carcass quality grade and yield grade were similar among all sire breeds.

Results of this study indicated that calf production from a properly managed drylot system can be comparable to pasture management if the drylot calves are creep fed. However, costs of production and market prices will determine if drylot management is economically feasible for individual operations.


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the South Dakota Agr. Exp. Sta. as Pub. No. 1520.

2 The authors gratefully acknowledge W.L. Tucker, Exp. Sta. Statistician, for the statistical analyses.

3 Department of Animal Science.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. J. Reed, A. L. Gelvin, G. P. Lardy, M. L. Bauer, and J. S. Caton
Effect of creep feed supplementation and season on intake, microbial protein synthesis and efficiency, ruminal fermentation, digestion, and performance in nursing calves grazing native range in southeastern North Dakota
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2006; 84(2): 411 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Animal Science.