J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1978. 46:769-777.
© 1978 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rhodes, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Randel, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rhodes, R. C., III
Right arrow Articles by Randel, R. D.

Effect of Feeding Protein-Protected Lipid upon Growth and Reproductive Development of Yearling Heifers1 ,2 ,3,

R. C. Rhodes, III, M. M. McCartor and R. D. Randel

Texas A&M University Agrcultural Research and Extension Center, Overton 75684

Abstract

Sixty prepuberal Brahman x Hereford F-l heifers were fed Coastal bermudagrass hay plus a concentrate containing zero (C) or 50% of a microencapsulated tallow (PL) for 168 days. Growth, as measured by height, length and weight gains, was similar for both feed groups. Controls had increased ruminal concentrations of total volatile fatty acids (P<.05). Protected lipidfed heifers had greater subcutaneous fat deposition (P<.005), greater intramuscular fat deposition (P<.10) and greater gain in body condition score (P<.005). Blood plasma glucose and triglyceride concentrations were similar for both treatments. Protected lipid-fed heifers tended to be more efficient in converting energy to weight gain (7.7 vs 7.9 Meal NEg/kg wt gain) than controls which required 13.7% more total feed/kg weight gain (P<.05). All heifers were bred in an artificial insemination program the last 60 days on test. Less protected lipid heifers reached puberty while on test than did control heifers [P<005; 34% (10/29) vs 80% (24/30), respectively]. Conception rates did not differ between groups.


Footnotes

1 Journal Paper TA 12916, Texas A&M University Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 The authors gratefully acknowledge Alta Lipids Ltd. for technical assistance and providing the protected lipid.

3 The authors gratefully acknowledge Eli Lilly and Co. for technical assistance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. W. Hess, G. E. Moss, and D. C. Rule
A decade of developments in the area of fat supplementation research with beef cattle and sheep
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E188 - E204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Animal Science.