J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1977. 45:1409-1414.
© 1977 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wyatt, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Totusek, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wyatt, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Totusek, R.

Effects of Single vs Simulated Twin Rearing on Cow and Calf Performance1 ,2,

R. D. Wyatt3, M. B. Gould4 and Robert Totusek3

Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater 74074 and and U.S. Department of Agriculture, El Reno 73036

Abstract

Forty-six Hereford x Holstein cows were used to determine the performance of cows and calves when calves were reared as singles or simulated twins. Simulated twins were produced by forced adoption of a second newborn calf by cows at the time of birth of their natural calf. Cows rearing simulated twins produced 39% more (P<.05) milk and required 72% more winter supplement to sustain a winter weight loss comparable to cows rearing single calves. Cows rearing simulated twins had extended postpartum anestrus periods which were apparently due to the greater suckling intensities to which they were exposed. Cows rearing simulated twins were nursed more frequently (4.8 vs 3.4 times daily) and for a longer (P<.05) total interval each day (41.9 vs 33.4 min).

Cows rearing simulated twin pairs weaned 60% more total calf weight than cows rearing single calves. Adopted calves nursed less frequently, for a shorter (P<.05) total interval daily and were 43 kg lighter at weaning than their natural born mates.


Footnotes

1 Journal Article 3217 of the Agricultural Experimental Station, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater. This research was conducted by the Department of Animal Science in cooperation with the USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Region.

2 The authors wish to express their appreciation to Leon Knori, Wayne Brown and Ed Stelting for their care of experimental animals and to Mike Brown for his assistance with the statistical analysis.

3 Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74074.

4 Present address: Southern Livestock and Forage Research Station, El Reno 73036.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. E. Curtis, R. L. Kallenbach, and C. A. Roberts
Allocating forage to fall-calving cow-calf pairs strip-grazing stockpiled tall fescue
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 780 - 789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. H. Abdelsamei, D. G. Fox, L. O. Tedeschi, M. L. Thonney, D. J. Ketchen, and J. R. Stouffer
The effect of milk intake on forage intake and growth of nursing calves
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 940 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Animal Science.