J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1977. 45:983-988.
© 1977 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by England, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by England, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, D. R.

Selection for Ovulation Rate in Swine: Correlated Response in Carcass Traits1

Marijane E. England2, P. J. Cunningham, R. W. Mandigo and Dwane R. Zimmerman

University of Nebraska, Lincoln 685833 ,4,

Abstract

Carcass data were collected for four traits on 179 Select and 187 Control line barrows in generations 3 through 8 to evaluate correlated responses to selection for increased ovulation rate in swine. Traits involved were carcass length, carcass backfat thickness, loin eye area and percent ham and loin. Two barrows were randomly selected for slaughter from each sire group with the restriction that barrows selected from a sire be from different litters (half-sibs).

Paternal half-sib estimates of heritability obtained were 1.12 ± .29, .94 ± .30, .76 ± .30 and .52 ± .31 for length, backfat, loin eye area and percent ham and loin, respectively. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic correlation among the traits were length with backfat –.48, –.38; length with loin eye area .00, –.05; length with percent ham and loin .47, .22; backfat with loin eye area –.73, –.23; backfat with percent ham and loin –.76, –.34; and loin eye area with percent ham and loin .58, .27.

Selection for ovulation rate was effective, resulting in a realized heritability of .40 ± .06 based on the regression of response on cumulative selection differential. Regressions of line difference on generation number for the four carcass traits were nonsignificant. Estimates obtained were .10 ± .07 cm for length, .06 ± .03 cm for backfat, –.28 ± .27 cm2 for loin eye area and –.21 ± .13 for percent ham and loin. Estimates of realized genetic correlation obtained between ovulation rate and length, backfat, loin eye area and percent ham and loin were –.16, .52, –.23 and –.52, respectively. Selection for ovulation rate did not result in statistically significant correlated response in any carcass traits, although there was a slight tendency for a reduction in overall carcass merit over time.


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director as Paper No. 5238, Journal Series, Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Research reported was conducted under Project 13-1.

2 Present address: University of Nebraska, North Platte Station, North Platte.

3 Department of Animal Science.

4 This research was supported in part by a cooperative agreement with the Agricultural Research Service, USDA.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Animal Science.