J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1977. 45:1166-1172.
© 1977 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heffron, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lisk, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heffron, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lisk, D. J.

Chemical Composition and Acceptability of Aquatic Plants in Diets of Sheep and Pregnant Goats1

C. L. Heffron2, J. T. Reid2, W. M. Haschek3, A. K. Furr5, T. F. Parkinson6, C. A. Bache4, W. H. Gutenmann4, L. E. St. John, Jr.4 and D. J. Lisk4

Cornell University, Ithaca 14853 and and Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg 24061

Abstract

Aquatic plants harvested from Cayuga Lake in New York were dried, milled and incorporated into a pelleted ration replacing 35% by weight of alfalfa meal. The ration was fed to pregnant goats and to sheep for 130 days. Analysis of the aquatic plants for 40 elements and polychlorinated biphenyls showed no toxic concentrations. There were no significant differences (P>.05) in feed intake, rate of weight gains or ration digestibility between the animals fed the aquatic ration and those fed the control ration. The aquatic ration was notably higher in ash and lower in fat, fiber and energy than was the control ration. All kids born were normal. Gross pathologic and histologic examination of animal tissues revealed no notable differences between animals fed the aquatic and control rations.


Footnotes

1 The authors thank J. W. Wilbur, W. A. English, T. H. Kuntz, W. F. Miller, J. Hotaling, H. G. Knight, L. F. Armitage, G. F. Rickey, T. G. Wright, J. C. Palermo, W. D. Youngs, E. J. Harris, R. Karcher, H. T. Greweling and C. Burda for their assistance during the course of this investigation.

2 Department of Animal Science.

3 Department of Veterinary Pathology.

4 Pesticide Residue Laboratory, Department of Food Science.

5 Office of Occupational Health and Safety.

6 Nuclear Reactor Laboratory.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Animal Science.