|
|
||||||||
U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of Nebraska,6, Clay Center 68933 and and Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506
Abstract
Two types of cattle (Angus-Hereford cross-breds, small type; and 3/4- or 7/8-Charolais and Chianina Hereford or Chianina Angus cross-breds, large type) were evaluated for their response to different dietary energy densities (2.9, 3.1, or 3.2 Meal ME/kg dry matter) (low, LE; medium, ME; and high, HE, respectively) and three dietary levels of crude protein (LP = 10, MP = 11.5 or HP = 13% of dry matter) in a 2 x 3 x 3 factorial design. The rations consisted of the following ratios of corn silage to corn plus supplement: LE, 43:67; ME, 25:75; and HE, 11:89. Small type cattle from each treatment were slaughtered after 196 and 232 days on experiment (460 ± 3 and 465 ± 3 days of age) and large type after 232 and 308 days (464 ± 3 and 566 ± 3 days of age). Increasing energy intake increased ADG in both types of cattle with HE>LE (P<05). Adjusted to constant carcass weight, increasing dietary energy intake increased marbling score, quality grade, fat thickness over the 12th rib, kidney and pelvic fat and yield grade in small type cattle but not in large type cattle. Rib moisture decreased (LE>ME = HE) and rib fat increased (LE<ME = HE) as a result of increased dietary energy intake (P<05).
Up to about 325 kg live weight, small type cattle increased ADG and feed efficiency with the MP compared to the LP intake. There was no advantage for the HP compared to MP. ADG and feed efficiency increased up to 348 kg live weight in large type cattle with the HP intake compared to the LP ration. The percentage of moisture and protein in the rib were decreased and fat was increased in large type cattle fed the 13% level of crude protein compared to those fed lower levels of dietary protein. Steaks from all carcasses of both types of cattle and from all energy or protein treatments were organoleptically acceptable in a taste panel evaluation.
1 The cooperation of the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Nebraska, Lincoln is acknowledged. Published as Cont. No. 512-J, Department of Animal Science and Industry, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Manhattan, 66506.
2 The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Mr. B. Sprowls and Mr. G. Short in feeding and managing the cattle in this experiment. Appreciation is expressed to Ms. B. Wells for typing this manuscript.
3 U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Agricultural Research Service.
4 Present address: Anderson Foundation, Maumee, OH 43537.
5 Department of Animal Science and Industry, Kansas State University.
6 Mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. E. Jenschke, J. R. Benton, C. R. Calkins, T. P. Carr, K. M. Eskridge, T. J. Klopfenstein, and G. E. Erickson Chemical and sensory properties of beef of known source and finished on wet distillers grains diets containing varying types and levels of roughage J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 949 - 959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |