J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1977. 44:1076-1079.
© 1977 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coulter, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Foote, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coulter, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Foote, R. H.

Relationship of Body Weight to Testicular Sixe and Consistency in Growing Holstein Bulls1

G. H. Coulter2 and R. H. Foote

Cornell University3, Ithaca, NY 14853

Abstract

The relationship between 1,203 measurements of scrotal circumference and testicular consistency, usually made at 6-month intervals, and body weight in 411 Holstein bulls, primarily 6 to 72 months of age, were analyzed. All bulls were weighed within 14 days of testicular measurement. The relationship between body weight in kg (Y) and bull age in months (X) is described by the regression equation, Y = –65.18 + 42.14 X –.39 X2, (r = .96). The equation that describes the relationship between body weight in kg (X) and scrotal circumference in cm (Y) is, Y = 22.5 3 + .032 X –.000013 X2, (r = .81). The linear regression equation relating average testicular tonometer deflections in mm (Y) and bull weight in kilogram (X) is Y = 15.35 –.0028 X, (r = –.45). When age was held constant the partial correlation between scrotal circumference and body weight was .58 (P<.01). Thus, as expected, body and testis size were correlated, but reports of similar relationships often have ignored the common and considerable influence of age. There was no uniform relationship between body weight and testicular consistency, although the partial correlation of –.16 (P<.01) indicates that heavier bulls, and perhaps those which were fatter, tended to have softer testes. Bulls with large testes may be larger, partly because of an anabolic effect of androgens, but this is speculative because these data do not permit distinction between a causal and casual relationship.


Footnotes

1 The authors appreciate the help of P. D. Miller and American Breeders Service in making body weight data available and J. Schiavo in processing the data. Helpful comments were made on the manuscript by P. D. Miller.

2 Address: Dr. G. H. Coulter, Agriculture Canada Research Station, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1.

3 Department of Animal Science.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Animal Science.