J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1977. 44:772-777.
© 1977 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheeke, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kohler, G. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cheeke, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kohler, G. O.

Freeze-Dried and Commercially-Prepared Alfalfa Protein Concentrate Evaluation with Rats and Swine1 ,2,

P. R. Cheeke3, J. H. Kinzell3, D De Fremery4 and G. O. Kohler4

Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331 and Berkeley 94710

Abstract

Alfalfa protein concentrate (APC) was evaluated as a protein source using rats and swine. In an experiment with young (18 kg initial weight) pigs, a freeze-dried (FD) APC sample gave growth and feed/gain similar to that with soybean meal (SBM) as the supplement, whereas gains were reduced (P<.01) with a commercial APC sample (X-Pro). A rat experiment indicated that both APC preparations gave increased growth when supplemented with lysine and methionine. Digestibility of the crude protein in the FD-APC was similar to that of SBM, while for the X-Pro it was lower (P<.01). Three other APC preparations, prepared with different drying temperatures (FD, 77 C, 91 C), were evaluated with rats and pigs. No differences (P<.05) in growth rate of pigs and rats fed these preparations occurred, but in both cases, the trend was to improved performance with reduced drying temperatures. The results indicate that the commercial preparation (X-Pro) was of inferior quality, but if adequate processing methods are used, APC can be the equal of soybean meal as a protein supplement for swine.


Footnotes

1 Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Paper No. 4325.

2 Reference to a company or product does not imply approval of recommendation of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.

3 Department of Animal Science, Oregon State University.

4 A.R.S., Western Regional Research Laboratory, Berkeley, CA







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Animal Science.